The Digital Video Information Network - View Single Post

Frank Granovski · August 11th, 2006, 06:56 AM

The MX300 just cuts out an area of the CCDs for the 16:9. I'm not sure but I think the PV-DV953/MX5 does the same thing with smaller CCDs but with more pixels.

August 11th, 2006, 06:56 AM	#5
Frank Granovski Outer Circle Join Date: May 2002 Location: Vancouver, BC Posts: 7,565	The MX300 just cuts out an area of the CCDs for the 16:9. I'm not sure but I think the PV-DV953/MX5 does the same thing with smaller CCDs but with more pixels.