The Digital Video Information Network  

Policy DV Info Net Intro / Articles & Reviews Image Gallery Sponsors
Go Back   The Digital Video Information Network > Special Interest Areas > Alternative Imaging Methods

Alternative Imaging Methods Where 35mm adapters were born. Subforum: The Letus35 Product Line.

Reply
Views: 746 - Replies: 4  
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old June 10th, 2008, 08:22 PM   #1
Tourist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 4
What is this circular background blur, home made DOF Adapter

Hi all

I have recently completed my first prototype DOF adapter. Utilising a vibrating wax GG.

I am just curious about a slight problem I am noticing which is beyond my knowledge of lenses.

It is attached and appears as a circular blurring of the out of focus background? It doesn't appear to affect the focused portions of the image and isnt following the vibrating pattern either which is almost vertical.

Only thing I can think of is the GG is too transparent?? not sure.
Attached Thumbnails
what-circular-background-blur-home-made-dof-adapter-dof-circular-blur-example.jpg  
Craig Turner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2008, 12:17 AM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 217
Images: 1
It's called "vortex" or something to the sort.
I believe it can be resolved by using a different achromat.

The apefos had a similar problem. I'm almost sure it was the achromat or the diffusion screen that changed it.
It basically looks like massive barrel distortion.
Rich Hibner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2008, 02:18 AM   #3
New Boot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 18
I experienced the same problem with my DIY adapter. Like this: http://www.pettersen-prod.com/35mm%2...web/still4.jpg

I had great luck in changing to a different, larger achromat that I made out of two binocular front elements. The "Vortex" dissapeared completely. The GG was not changed.
Jon Pettersen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2008, 04:31 AM   #4
Tourist
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Perth
Posts: 4
ohhh ok,

I'm not actually using an achromat at all as the camera could focus on the focus screen without one.

is this a secondary reason for using a achromat? am i correct in it's main purpose, to reduce the minimum focal distance of the video camera?

might have to try and make one.

cheers
Craig Turner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2008, 06:29 AM   #5
New Boot
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Norway
Posts: 18
It really depends on what camera you use. I have heard that the HV20, for example, can be used without and achromat. However, It exhibits a lot more barrel distortion.

Here is the tutorial I followed when I made my own achro: http://www.jetsetmodels.info/pics/achromat_tutorial.pdf
Jon Pettersen is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers...
Precision Camera
(866) 802-8500
Austin, TX
B&H Photo Video
(800) 947-8002
New York, NY
TapeWorks Texas
(866) 827-3489
Houston, TX
VideoGuys.com
(800) 323-2325
Glen Cove, NY
Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA
Z.G.C.
(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ
DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: The Digital Video Information Network > Special Interest Areas > Alternative Imaging Methods

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

 


Google
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:37 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2008 The Digital Video Information Network