View Full Version : Why RED listens to us...


Steve Gibby
April 23rd, 2006, 10:29 AM
Why is RED listening to us?

I think it’s wisdom for manufacturers to listen closely to the front line shooters as they do the R & D on a new camera system. The unusual aspect of RED's development process is that they've involved the convergent cinematographer and videographer communities in the thought process of what the RED camera should be like. They've actively sought input on what we, the front-line shooters, feel are the key features, technology, ergonomics, and utility of the camera. Even more peculiar, is that they’ve sought that input from every strata of the shooting community, from prosumer shooters all the way up to the most seasoned DP's. What a novel concept in this industry - enlist the suggestions of all potential users of the camera throughout the development process!

Anyone who has known Jim Jannard for any length of time shouldn't be surprised in the slightest by this type of product development strategy. The same strategy has been enormously successful for Oakley. If I could point to two core items that have been the key to Oakley's success, they are: 1) they have listened closely and consistently to their target market, and given them what they want 2) they are masters of viral marketing and getting their target market buzzed about their products. The same guy that successfully pioneered that strategy with Oakley, is now the founder of RED - Jim Jannard.

A significant portion of my international and national television background since the early '80's has been as a producer, director, and DP for the televising of multiple action sports world tours. Oakley has developed and thrived in that same industry over that same time span. Oakley has been a key sponsor for many of the professional sports tours that I've been involved with televising. They have consistently listened to their core audience, given them what they crave, and created a buzz for their products. It's a simple, but wildly successful strategy, and I'm not the least bit surprised to see RED go down a similar path – and why shouldn’t they?

As a near 30-year veteran producer, director, and DP, I'm tired of having limited options for camera systems, and quite frankly I've grown very tired of the customary R & D process by some large camera manufacturers who feign listening to their users, and then quite often produce overpriced, low utilitarian value, feature-crippled cameras that have limited use in today's convergent production environment. If RED succeeds with their new camera system, the dynamic of the R & D and marketing paradigm for the overall TV/film camera industry will have irreversibly changed.

I hope this insight into the roots of RED will help everyone understand that RED didn’t just pull their R & D and marketing strategies out of a hat. It’s been a thoroughly successful approach in the sunglass industry, and there’s no reason to believe it won’t be just as successful in the convergent motion media production industry. The people at RED, including Jim Jannard, are hands-on shooters. Don’t let the billionaire tag obscure the reality that Jim’s favorite pastime has always been to simply take a camera out and shoot some great images. He hangs out in jeans and T-shirts. He’s one of us…someone who is passionate about shooting.

I hope this personal insight into Jim Jannard helps you understand why RED listens to us…

No, I’m not an employee of RED, and nobody has asked me to write this post. I’m just someone who has some unique insight into how RED was born.

Chris Hurd
April 23rd, 2006, 11:21 AM
Thanks Steve -- terrific insight. I've known Jim only for a few months, but have known *of* him for quite a while. My favorite Jim Jannard story involves Lance Armstrong's successful battle against cancer. Basically, Armstrong's cancer diagnosis hit him at a point where he had no medical insurance, which was practically a death sentance... no provider would touch him. Jim found out about this and immediately stepped up to the plate, arranging full coverage for Lance. Pretty much saving the man's life, and as we all know, creating a champion in the process. Now that's my idea of a camera designer right there.

More details:

http://www.bikesportmichigan.com/editorials/0000036.shtml

http://forums.nitromater.com/printthread.php?t=9483&pp=40

Mathieu Ghekiere
April 23rd, 2006, 11:27 AM
Thanks for the post, Steve.
That's the reason why I love RED so much at this moment: the way they handdle all these things.
I don't have the budget to buy or rent a camera now, but I'm planning to do some shooting later for a low budget feature, maybe even in a couple of years.
And already now I'm thinking that RED will be my choice...

EDIT:

My favorite Jim Jannard story involves Lance Armstrong's successful battle against cancer. Basically, Armstrong's cancer diagnosis hit him at a point where he had no medical insurance, which was practically a death sentance... no provider would touch him. Jim found out about this and immediately stepped up to the plate, arranging full coverage for Lance. Pretty much saving the man's life, and as we all know, creating a champion in the process.

Wow, I even didn't know that, that's an amazing story.

Steve Gibby
April 23rd, 2006, 12:40 PM
Chris, I'm glad you brought up the Lance Armstrong story. Jim's helping Lance is a great illustration of another dimension of Jim. He's someone who cares about the world and those around him.

In 1994 I donated my time as a director, DP, and editor for a charity project in India. I traveled by myself to direct and shoot a fundraising video for a crippled childrens hospital that was being dedicated in Madras, and the dedication of ground for a second childrens hospital in Bangalore. And who was on the list of primary donators to that project? Jim Jannard.

It's one thing to be good at business and gather wealth, but when someone then uses their resources to help others in need, that's a whole new scenario...

Ben Winter
April 24th, 2006, 07:31 AM
Jim Jannard's my hero.