Should Premiere and After Effects be merged? at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Cross-Platform Post Production Solutions > Adobe Creative Suite

Adobe Creative Suite
All about the world of Adobe Premiere and its associated plug-ins.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 25th, 2012, 03:24 AM   #1
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 102
Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

I've been learning Adobe Premiere Pro CS6 and After Effects CS6 on lynda.com. (Actually I preferred the CS5 tutorial so I've been watching that one instead of the CS6 one).

It occurs to me that these products are similar, and duplicate much functionality. After Effects has some video editing capability but Premiere is much better at it. Likewise, Premiere has some filters and effects but After Effects is much better at it. Should the products be merged?

Richard
__________________
Sony PMW-EX1R, Miller tripod and dolly, Rode NTG-1 shotgun mic, Adobe Creative Cloud
Richard Cavell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2012, 04:18 AM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warsaw/Poland
Posts: 716
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

They most likely won't, even though many of us would like it. The underlying software architecture is very different, despite the UI similarities.
__________________
Creative Impatience - The Solace of Simple Solutions. A few useful plugins for Adobe users, and my remarks on the tools and the craft in general.
Bart Walczak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2012, 01:10 PM   #3
Adobe Systems
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 191
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

Yes, they are like two different animals.
__________________
Kevin Monahan - Support Product ManageróDVA
After Effects - Premiere Pro - Media Encoder - Prelude - SpeedGrade - Encore
Kevin Monahan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2012, 01:28 PM   #4
Trustee
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,384
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

Merging would make the Ui too cluttered as there are very different toolsets that would have to be maintained. Generally I work In both apps but with very different mindsets. I also throw Pro Tools into the mix (pun intended) as it is my preferred audio editing/mixing platform. The delegating of duties allows me to focus on what I'm doing without having to worry about the other areas of post production. Call me old school!
__________________
A7RII, C100, 1Dx, 5Dmk3, 70D, Kessler goodies, Adobe, Pro Tools and more!
Robert Turchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2012, 07:11 PM   #5
Trustee
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Byron Bay, Australia
Posts: 1,142
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

I wouldn't like to see them merged - that would result in one severely overcomplicated program - from a programmers perspective and a users perspective. Not to mention it would throw the whole pricing structure of the suites/individual products out the window.

However, there are some AE features that I believe should be built into Premiere. I was extremely happy that stabilisation was included in Premiere CS6, as this was one thing I used when editing every wedding video, and previously required a trip to AE. What I would also really like to see in Premiere is some basic masking tools - similar to what is available in Sony Vegas Pro via the "Event Pan/Crop" window. This would let you apply customised vignette's really easily (Adjstment layers have made this easier, but still don't give you enough control). At the moment anything other than a circle vignette (which is actually fairly useless on a 16:9 frame) requires a trip to AE, or you can create and import an image with transparency from Photoshop. Simple masking would make it really easy to do this inside Premiere, as well as make simple lower 3rds, or other custom shapes you might need.
John Wiley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2012, 10:57 PM   #6
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 1,385
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Richard Cavell View Post
Should the products be merged?

Richard
I don't think they can be (at least not in their present states) -

1. After Effects is a layer based engine, and under the hood it uses quite a bit of node-based technology too. This system does not work very well with a timeline.
2. After Effects uses scripts
3. After Effects uses RAM previews while Premiere is now configured to use the mercury engine (which is a joy to use in CS6)
4. Mainly After Effects has a totally different development history compared to Premiere. Even though Bridge offers round-trip capability, After Effects is also used in projects where Premiere is not the main editing engine, e.g. FCP or Avid. In fact, Adobe has bought Automatic Duck and it ships free with CS6.
5. It would take a full rewrite of code from scratch - and not all projects need After Effects. It would make things too bloated. After Effects is bloated as is - try using another comp app like Nuke to see the difference.

My take is, even they can be, they shouldn't be.
__________________
Get the Free Comprehensive Guide to Rigging ANY Camera - one guide to rig them all - DSLRs to the Arri Alexa.
Sareesh Sudhakaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 25th, 2012, 11:41 PM   #7
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Western Australia
Posts: 576
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

They wont, too much $$$$$ to be made for Adobe. Shame but true.
Lee Mullen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2012, 01:37 AM   #8
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 185
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

I agree. The architecture is too different. AE isn't designed to work on an entire movie, in my mind it's meant to do special things to short clips. When I have several AE links in a PP sequence(s) PP becomes more manageable because it hides the AE details (which can be massive). If I had to deal with all the complexities of those AE clips while trying to tell a story I'd probably get nothing done.
Kawika Ohumukini is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 26th, 2012, 01:11 PM   #9
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 694
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

Quote:
Originally Posted by John Wiley View Post
At the moment anything other than a circle vignette (which is actually fairly useless on a 16:9 frame) requires a trip to AE, .
Ann Bens is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 27th, 2012, 04:45 AM   #10
Major Player
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Warsaw/Poland
Posts: 716
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

In terms of vignettes, let me just say that if Adobe added support for Premiere color spaces in one function in AE SDK, the problem would have already been solved. For everyone. For free.
__________________
Creative Impatience - The Solace of Simple Solutions. A few useful plugins for Adobe users, and my remarks on the tools and the craft in general.
Bart Walczak is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 27th, 2012, 07:54 AM   #11
Trustee
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Byron Bay, Australia
Posts: 1,142
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

Thanks Ann, I'd overlooked the circle effect. Instead I had been using the ramp effect and blend modes, then using the transform effect to make it wider.

I suppose with multiple layers it is possible to get whatever vignette shape you want, but it would be a whole lot easier if you could just draw a quick mask. For example, for a talking head interview, it would be great to be able to roughly outline the subject, bump the mask feather right up, and get a nice even falloff of light all around the subject.
John Wiley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2012, 04:26 AM   #12
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Ipswich, Queensland, Australia
Posts: 102
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

I can definitely see why After Effects is not suitable in its present state for editing an entire movie. However, I have difficulty seeing why all of the functionality of After Effects cannot be imported into Premiere Pro. Layers are pretty similar to video tracks. The effects/filters and keyframes work the same way. At the very least, all of the effects could be ported to Premiere Pro and that would make AE pretty redundant.

Richard
__________________
Sony PMW-EX1R, Miller tripod and dolly, Rode NTG-1 shotgun mic, Adobe Creative Cloud
Richard Cavell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 28th, 2012, 10:04 AM   #13
Major Player
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: York, England
Posts: 502
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

I am sure that Adobe would amalgamate the two (as they did with Encore) if they could, then those of us who have no use for After Effects would have to pay the extra for it when we want to upgrade Premiere!

More $$$$$, which seems to be what Adobe is all about these days.
Alan Craven is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 29th, 2012, 04:37 PM   #14
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Kelowna Canada
Posts: 34
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

As someone who uses both a lot I would say no. They should focus on incorporating after effects on some level in the the mercury playback engine, even if it is limited to only some effects & tools at first.
Other than that it would be nice if they could make a "motion template" style system, set up a graphics/title composite in AE then in premiere have the option to alter the text, adjust specified effects/parameters, and change drop zone images/video. Something like that would be great for animated lower thirds & full screen text supers, it worked/works well with motion & FCP7(other than the speed/performance).

With adjustment layers in premiere pro CS6 you can see adobe is willing to bring over features from AE, though they don't need to bring it all over.
Nevin Styre is offline   Reply With Quote
Old July 2nd, 2012, 08:23 AM   #15
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Maassluis, The Netherlands
Posts: 294
Re: Should Premiere and After Effects be merged?

I vote 'no'.

Dig deeper in AE and you'll discover editing and compositing in the same program will be messy, slow and tiresome.
Dynamic linking works fine.
And when a composite is ready, but complicated I export it to put in Premiere.
(Complicated = over a 100 layers with different overlay modi, multiple effects, including particles, lights, etc)

Imagine the layer structure of AE in Premiere. That would mean some of my edits would require over a 1000 tracks.
Or imagine parenting in a Premiere Pro structure.

For vignettes I recommend looking at Red Giant's Colorista.
__________________
Brainstormnavigator searching for the hole in the sky.....
Audiovisual Designer (NL) - http://www.brokxmedia.nl
Walter Brokx is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Z.G.C.
(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Cross-Platform Post Production Solutions > Adobe Creative Suite

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



Google
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 01:02 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2017 The Digital Video Information Network