DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Adobe Creative Suite (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/adobe-creative-suite/)
-   -   Quad Core only 50% faster???? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/adobe-creative-suite/87909-quad-core-only-50-faster.html)

Stacy Rothwell March 1st, 2007 08:14 PM

Quad Core only 50% faster????
 
Hi!

I had a CORE2 DUO E6700 CPU until tonight when I upgraded to a QX6700 Quad Core.

However, I am only seeing a 50% improvement when measuring exporting a M2T file. Also, when I look at a CPU monitor (which correctly registers all 4 cores) it is only showing that each core is only working at 25%.

Is there a trick or something to getting Premiere, after effects, or Windows in general to fully utilize all 4 cores at 100% when rendering or did I just flush $1000 down the drain?

thanks for any help!

PS: Running WinXP SP2 with 2GB DDR6400

Steve Montoto March 1st, 2007 10:29 PM

Hi Stacy,

I found this review you might want to read.

http://www.tomshardware.com/2006/11/...ield_released/

Mikko Lopponen March 2nd, 2007 06:29 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stacy Rothwell (Post 634389)
Also, when I look at a CPU monitor (which correctly registers all 4 cores) it is only showing that each core is only working at 25%.

That is how it should be. 25% is one core. It is utilizing itself fully. If everything is 100% that means all cores are at 25%.

Marco Wagner March 12th, 2007 05:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mikko Lopponen (Post 634580)
That is how it should be. 25% is one core. It is utilizing itself fully. If everything is 100% that means all cores are at 25%.

I'm not totally sure that is correct, if the app calls for it -all cores can and should run up to 100%. Stacy, download SuperPI and you should be able to run 4 instances of it before your machine bogs down. THAT should max all your CPUs out to 100%. 2 instances should yield you a 50% load on your system and so on... If your CPU monitor shows only 25% with one instance of SuperPI than each core is working at 6.25% OR one core is at 100% and the other three are sitting in wait state. What CPU monitor are you using? Taskmanager?

If I'm wrong about this, I'm sorry, but I believe that is correct. The problem is that Intel's multi-core chips don't talk to each other as well (fast) as AMD's multi-core chips, so you will see some latency here and there.

Ben Winter March 12th, 2007 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marco Wagner (Post 640590)
I'm not totally sure that is correct, if the app calls for it -all cores can and should run up to 100%. Stacy, download SuperPI and you should be able to run 4 instances of it before your machine bogs down. THAT should max all your CPUs out to 100%. 2 instances should yield you a 50% load on your system and so on... If your CPU monitor shows only 25% with one instance of SuperPI than each core is working at 6.25% OR one core is at 100% and the other three are sitting in wait state. What CPU monitor are you using? Taskmanager?

If I'm wrong about this, I'm sorry, but I believe that is correct. The problem is that Intel's multi-core chips don't talk to each other as well (fast) as AMD's multi-core chips, so you will see some latency here and there.

Yes, that's correct. I have a quad core system and all are shown to work at 100% individually rather than 25% each. Haven't noticed if it happens in Premiere though...

Marco Wagner March 12th, 2007 09:10 PM

I thought so, mine max out out 100% when using the Windows Media Encoder x64 Edition. Premiere Pro hits 100% on mine a few times here or there. I assume usually one core can handle a pretty good load. With a quad-core it would probably bounce the threads around balancing the load. 64bit software will help kill this issue. You can also try what I do:


Open task manager and give Premiere Pro one or two cores all to itself. Then set it to HIGH or REALTIME. If you do REALTIME, test first. You should see a slight boost.

Tim Kolb March 13th, 2007 08:39 PM

Keep in mind that when you are video editing, the speed of the buss and the drives are key. In cases where the buss can't haul it, the processor won't run at full utilization. From what I've seen, the earliest crop of Quad cores actually has a slower buss and slower RAM...getting the math on and off the chip is the issue. Adding an engine to your car and putting a 'Y' in the fuel line and merging the exhaust pipe won't create extra power...neither will more processor cores with a slower buss to bring information.

Keep in mind that software applications need to be designed to include this many processing threads as well. Some tasks are very linear and breaking them apart into 4 or 8 separate threads isn't always possible.

3d guys will love Quad cores as they aren't pushing data through like a video editor does...they actually trickle data in and process the heck out of it to render. This is where a Quad core will shine at the moment...

TimK

Marco Wagner March 13th, 2007 10:10 PM

Yep that too, at this point we need 64 bit, multi-threaded software to really see some boost until Intel at least gets their act together. AMD's HT is pretty decent. The hard disk and BUS speeds have been a bottleneck forever, hello solid state drives!!! My next purchase for the system. Want to see a slight boost, up your BUS speed if your memory can handle it. I get 3 seconds knocked off of every 1 minute render with just a couple MHz increase.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:56 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network