DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   All Things Audio (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/all-things-audio/)
-   -   Same Mic, Different Camera, Disappointing Audio (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/all-things-audio/105700-same-mic-different-camera-disappointing-audio.html)

Jordie Shapiro October 15th, 2007 12:26 PM

Same Mic, Different Camera, Disappointing Audio
 
Hi Guys,

I recently upgraded from a PD150 camcorder to Canon's A1, and on my first shoot with the new camera, I attached the PD150's shotgun mic to it.
During interviews, I noticed much more background noise than ever before. I assume the problem lies in my settings, as I don't know too much about audio.

I shot with ATT set to off, and with the camera set to Mic (not Line). There was no reason behind these decisions. I also had Auto Levels turned on.

Thanks,

Jordie Shapiro
www.jordieshapiro.com

Petri Kaipiainen October 15th, 2007 12:28 PM

Did you turn on the XLR inputs from the audio menu? If not, you were using the in-cam mics.

Jordie Shapiro October 15th, 2007 12:34 PM

Yes! I was definitely getting audio through the attached mic.

Do you think having the audio set to Auto Levels, helped bring up the background noise?

Ty Ford October 15th, 2007 08:45 PM

absolutely.

I try never to use autogain on mics.

Ty Ford

Petri Kaipiainen October 16th, 2007 12:14 AM

Autogain does not affect the loudess ratio between the voice of the talent and bacground, it might just pump up the levels during quiet passages.

Ty Ford October 16th, 2007 08:14 AM

That depends on how loud the ambient noise is. If it's reasonably loud and the talent is a quiet speaker, the autogain responds to the noise floor more than the voice. The, even those quiet passages are no long quiet.

Regards,

Ty Ford

Michael Nistler October 16th, 2007 11:49 AM

Hi Jordie,

I'm guessing you're auto-gain hunt is a bit of a wild goose chase. If you are using any microphone more than 10 feet from your subject, you won't be happy with the results. Autogain or manually cranked up, proximity effect is your enemy - unless you can get your subjects to yell their words... <wink>

However, you did say you had better results with the PD150 - did you use a different shotgun mic there?

Good luck, Michael

Ty Ford October 16th, 2007 12:31 PM

FWIW,

I had an "Audio Bootcamp" here in my studio a few years back and someone brought a PD150. We were very shocked by the comparison between the PD150 on-camera mic and a Sennheiser 416. It was not just a night and day difference, it was more like a night and day and night and day and night and day difference.


As I explained to them, the camera costs, what, about $3-4K? A 416 costs about $1300. How much of the $3-4K do you think went into the mic? Maybe $100-200?

The take away message is that you DO have to pay for quality.

Take away message Part B is, if you can't get closer than a few feet (acoustics of the space depending), your sound will suck regardless of which mic you use.

Part C is, "No, really, you have to get closer if you want good sound."

Regards,

Ty Ford


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:07 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network