Steve House |
August 18th, 2010 04:01 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jad Meouchy
(Post 1560123)
Not when it was done 'for hire'.
|
Right, but it's not a 'work for hire' unless it's explicitly stated to be so in a written contract. Some people think the simple fact of the photographer having been paid automatically makes it a work for hire. It doesn't. The copyright on a work produced as an independent contractor still belongs to the contractor unless there's a writing to the contrary.
|