EE-S vs. EE-A screen at DVinfo.net

Juro Stehlik · November 28th, 2006, 04:38 PM

Hi, which focusing screen is better for static adaptor design? Could someone, who owns both of this screens post some screenshots? Is one of them less grainly than other? Thanks

Chris Knight · November 28th, 2006, 04:47 PM

From what I hear, The EE-S is pretty good if used properly.

Check out this thread

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=74356

Juro Stehlik · November 29th, 2006, 04:03 PM

thanks for reply, i know that thread. But many people are using EE-S and some EE-A. I would like to know, why is S better than A or reversely:) If am i right, the EE-S one is darker, but is less grainly, has better bokeh, or why is it, that many users preffer this one? Thanks

Toenis Liivamaegi · November 30th, 2006, 03:02 AM

Another reason for using EE-S is the ease of focusing as the name suggests - "Super Precision Focusing".
Please watch the worst cases with static EE-S screen (wmv 6MB) for evaluation.

EE-S screen loses only 3% of light and EE-A doesn`t seem to lose any.

EE-S has (kind of strange) bokeh when lens are fully open and EE-A forms bokeh from f4 and on.

If hazy bokeh and easy focusing isn`t your concern I would suggest that you should use EE-A.

Cheers,
T

Tony Relph · November 30th, 2006, 04:15 AM

So has anyone actually perfected the EE-S or EE-A static design. Everyone seems to be saying that the EE-S screen is perfect for a static solution but no one has yet produced good quality static stills or footage. Does anyone have any decent static stills or footage from the EE-S screens? Ive seen some EE-A stills but not sure if it was static as it did not say.

Tony Relph · November 30th, 2006, 04:16 AM

So has anyone actually perfected the EE-S or EE-A static design. Everyone seems to be saying that the EE-S screen is perfect for a static solution but no one has yet produced good quality static stills or footage. Does anyone have any decent static stills or footage from the EE-S screens? Ive seen some EE-A stills but not sure if it was static as it did not say.

Also Toenis, do you have a picture of your static screen holder I could see please.

Toenis Liivamaegi · November 30th, 2006, 05:50 AM

I`ve posted this quite many times but here you can download static clips filmed with static EE-S screen.
Image softness is directly associated with camcorder lens sharpness fully open or not.

T

I J Walton · November 30th, 2006, 12:43 PM

What size are these screens? I noticed that they are for a DSLR, so are they a little smaller that 35mm?

Tony Relph · November 30th, 2006, 03:27 PM

Can we see your static holder please Toenis?

Thanks,

November 28th, 2006, 04:38 PM	#1
Juro Stehlik New Boot Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Slovakia Posts: 12	EE-S vs. EE-A screen Hi, which focusing screen is better for static adaptor design? Could someone, who owns both of this screens post some screenshots? Is one of them less grainly than other? Thanks

November 30th, 2006, 04:15 AM	#5
Tony Relph Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Canary Wharf, London E14 Posts: 166	So has anyone actually perfected the EE-S or EE-A static design. Everyone seems to be saying that the EE-S screen is perfect for a static solution but no one has yet produced good quality static stills or footage. Does anyone have any decent static stills or footage from the EE-S screens? Ive seen some EE-A stills but not sure if it was static as it did not say. __________________ Tony Relph. anthonyjohnrelph@hotmail.com

November 30th, 2006, 04:16 AM	#6
Tony Relph Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Canary Wharf, London E14 Posts: 166	So has anyone actually perfected the EE-S or EE-A static design. Everyone seems to be saying that the EE-S screen is perfect for a static solution but no one has yet produced good quality static stills or footage. Does anyone have any decent static stills or footage from the EE-S screens? Ive seen some EE-A stills but not sure if it was static as it did not say. Also Toenis, do you have a picture of your static screen holder I could see please. __________________ Tony Relph. anthonyjohnrelph@hotmail.com

November 30th, 2006, 12:43 PM	#8
I J Walton Regular Crew Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 40	What size are these screens? I noticed that they are for a DSLR, so are they a little smaller that 35mm? Last edited by I J Walton; November 30th, 2006 at 06:24 PM.

November 30th, 2006, 03:27 PM	#9
Tony Relph Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2006 Location: Canary Wharf, London E14 Posts: 166	Can we see your static holder please Toenis? Thanks, __________________ Tony Relph. anthonyjohnrelph@hotmail.com

November 28th, 2006, 04:47 PM	#2
Chris Knight Regular Crew Join Date: Sep 2006 Location: Hyde Park, New York Posts: 53	From what I hear, The EE-S is pretty good if used properly. Check out this thread http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=74356

November 29th, 2006, 04:03 PM	#3
Juro Stehlik New Boot Join Date: Aug 2006 Location: Slovakia Posts: 12	thanks for reply, i know that thread. But many people are using EE-S and some EE-A. I would like to know, why is S better than A or reversely:) If am i right, the EE-S one is darker, but is less grainly, has better bokeh, or why is it, that many users preffer this one? Thanks

November 30th, 2006, 03:02 AM	#4
Toenis Liivamaegi Major Player Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Tartu, Estonia Posts: 579	Another reason for using EE-S is the ease of focusing as the name suggests - "Super Precision Focusing". Please watch the worst cases with static EE-S screen (wmv 6MB) for evaluation. EE-S screen loses only 3% of light and EE-A doesn`t seem to lose any. EE-S has (kind of strange) bokeh when lens are fully open and EE-A forms bokeh from f4 and on. If hazy bokeh and easy focusing isn`t your concern I would suggest that you should use EE-A. Cheers, T

November 30th, 2006, 05:50 AM	#7
Toenis Liivamaegi Major Player Join Date: Nov 2005 Location: Tartu, Estonia Posts: 579	I`ve posted this quite many times but here you can download static clips filmed with static EE-S screen. Image softness is directly associated with camcorder lens sharpness fully open or not. T