View Full Version : Studio equipment


Gustavs Repse
April 17th, 2013, 09:19 AM
Hello

How are you guys and galls :)

A friend of mine aproached me few days ago asking for my help.

She is managing an organization afiliated with church which is helping people in need, and recently someone offered her sponsorship in order for her to make a small production company that would focus on documenting the work they are doing.

She has never done video related things before, so she doesnt know what she should buy for her studio.

Here are some of the stats:

-Her budget is around 12000 usd

- The videos that she has in mind at the moment are, interviews with people who would come to her studio with lights setup and everything, music videos, travelin to hotspots and interviewing peple on the move. Something along these lines.

- later on she wants to get their videos on television. (They have connections with a local Christian chanel)
so I dont know what limitations/set of standarts that would imply for her to achieve.



I dont know a lot about studio equipement, so I wouldnt dare tell her what to spend money on from my personal opinion.

If I'm looking on a really budget production Id say:

Get Canon 550d + Canon EF 24-70mm f2.8 L USM Lens

Zoom h4n + a decent boom mic

Tripod for about 400 usd

No idea about lights tho or other atributes needed for a studio.




Would appreciate your input.

for 12000 usd, what should they be focusing their money on, what are the essentials and what specific equipement you would recomend.

If you need more info, let me know

Edit: Thx chris! This section seems like a better fit.

Chris Hurd
April 17th, 2013, 09:57 AM
Thread moved from Techniques of Ind. Production to our studio outfitting forum, Home Away From Home.

Chris Medico
April 17th, 2013, 10:42 AM
If you are going to do a full studio setup with at least a basic light kit I would recommend against using a dSLR. Go with a real video camera. It may be more expensive than the Canon but you gain the ability to feed the audio directly into the camera eliminating the need for the external recorder. Your post production workflow it is so much simpler if the audio is already synced with the video.

If you are looking for the large imager look you can get a Sony FS100 or Canon C100. Either of those will consume just under half the budget. Either will offer you a much better operational experience with longer record times and better audio handling.

The balance of your budget will fit nicely with getting a lighting kit, good mics, and tripod.

Spend $2-3k for a couple of Kino Flo style key lights and get a couple of hard lights to handle rim/hair and background.

Plan for $800 for a good set of heavy duty stands and weight bags.

Spend $1k to $1.5k for a decent tripod (such as this one - Vinten VB-AP2M Vision Blue System with Mid Level Spreader).

I have a set of the AT899 lav mics and find them reasonably small, offering good sound, and not a budget buster. Audio-Technica AT899 - Condenser Lavalier Microphone AT899 B&H

Wireless audio is nice but many times not necessary. A 50' XLR cable is much cheaper than an equally good sounding wireless setup.

Based on the parts above you'll have $$ left over for those little bits and pieces you always need.

Gustavs Repse
April 17th, 2013, 02:35 PM
Thank you Chris:)

I have my doubts about the camera. It does cost 5.5k usd and here in Latvia it will most definetely cost even more. Besides 5.5 is only for body, so a good lense will also be needed and I bet it will go for 1k usd.

I love the idea of video being synced, because having a separate device just for audio and all the post problems it brings with it is very annoying. But for the kind of productions they will be running, I think they can go for a cheeper camera. ( with audio recording option on camera)

The rest I still have to research rest of your sugestions.

Could you give me some more info on the lights please, perhaps you have some specific models you can recomend me ?

Paul R Johnson
April 17th, 2013, 03:18 PM
Spend some of the money on getting an an expert to initially advise. They will find out what you want to do, and produce your shopping list and then they will train you how to use it. If your friend is clueless and you are not up to speed either, then neither of you can do this without help. We can advise, but you need local help!

Allan Black
April 17th, 2013, 07:13 PM
^ +1. Producing competant video programs that people will watch, is not something you learn to do overnight.

I've seen this before, as we all have. Someone is enthusiatic, gets it all up and running over some time, maybe years, then leaves the organisation.

Imo a much better plan is to get off to a great start by calling in some professional help. You still need the 'enthusiastic person' in the organisation
and even then it's full time job for them.

Most importantly, the first video will look and sound professional, the viewers will come back to look at the second and third ones etc.

Cheers.

Dylan Couper
April 18th, 2013, 09:57 AM
+2
Hire a professional to consult, but one who understands low budget set ups and how to get the most out of your $12k.
You need to make a decision about trying to get it on TV up front, if you're serious about that, you can forget the DSLR right now.
If it was me I'd get an fs100. Around... $4500 new now? Best bang for the buck.
For lighting go directly to Dvestore, one of the forum sponsors, and talk to Guy there. Actually, go there for your audio too.

Im fairly certain i could put this together for under $10k... At least in NorthAmerica. :)
Actually.... Once you have the budget in hand, email me through the forum and ill help you with the camera setup side of things.

Gustavs Repse
April 18th, 2013, 10:38 AM
+3 really. that's what I told them myself, to get someone who will be working with this equipement and to let them know what he will need.

But, I was missing the point.


They have a sponsor who is generously willing to give them the money, without asking much or anything in return. These people that I am helping are willing to and they want to learn about how to get this all working, how to make video productions etc. It's more of a way to spread their message than it is bussiness.

But, they need equipement first.
Their moto, I guess, is <get the equipement first> and then get people who will operate it.
They have been doing things this way before as well, succesfully.

I find it a bit strange approach, but thats how it is.

Dylan, I will pm you, I really would like to hear your suggestions.

Jack D. Hubbard
April 25th, 2013, 01:13 PM
Hi Gustav,

All great suggestions. I actually have a Vinten Vision Blue tripod for sale at $750. Because of a lot of travel I am now using a smaller Miller DS10 with a Canon XF300.

Regards,

Jack Hubbard

Gustavs Repse
April 26th, 2013, 05:27 PM
Hey Jack D.

Thanks for the offer, but at the moment there is a lot of confusion from all sides about what they want/can afford/need. So we're not ready to buy anything, and when we will be, we will probably buy from a local retailer.

I will contact some of the local retailers, explain them my friends needs and budget and see what they can fit in that price ranger.

Sareesh Sudhakaran
April 26th, 2013, 09:32 PM
I recommend a Blackmagic Cinema Camera, which will give you a similar form factor, and the ability to record audio. You will also get Resolve, which I believe as of version 10 as some editing abilities as well.

Your lens will proportionately get smaller, and cheaper.

Once this camera has paid back its price, you can upgrade to the 4K version if and when it comes out.

Warren Kawamoto
May 1st, 2013, 11:35 AM
Is your budget supposed to include computer/editing hardware-software? If yes, then it totally changes the ballgame. Most of the above suggestions would not be affordable.

Gustavs Repse
May 14th, 2013, 01:12 PM
Well

Black magic camera, hmmmm, why didnt others suggest it?

I crave it myself for personal use, but for a studio? Maybe the zoom wouldnt be as good as for a sony cam.


And the Editing software and computer, hmmm.

Computer has to be included in price, and I believe it will take araund 500 euros. I have a 500 euro pc, and it suits me quite well for editing.

Editing software, khemmm, they know "cheep" ways

Mark Williams
May 14th, 2013, 02:37 PM
The folks planning to do video production will face a pretty steep learning curve. If the priority is to produce a good looking product then I would contract out the work. If it is to learn how to DIY then I think at a minimum they need some training.

Paul R Johnson
May 14th, 2013, 03:30 PM
people who want to make programmes may have no idea of the convoluted workflows that clever DSLRs and other high end HD cameras have. A couple of real video cameras with zooms, studio viewfinders and a small mixer could be what is needed, and then edits become top/tail and a few titles. Using cameras that need a technician to keep running might be very silly. Blackmagic cameras are excellent - but they're not beginner friendly whatsoever are they? This is why many of us have said get an expert in who can ask questions. It may well be that ultimate quality simply isn't needed, but simplicity is?

Les Wilson
May 14th, 2013, 07:11 PM
I set this up for a church recently. You cannot get video production by buying equipment. Ultimately, it takes someone with experience (not someone handy with technology, they are the worst).

As everyone else has told you, after you buy this stuff, you will be nowhere without someone who knows what they are doing to set it up, use it, know how to conduct interviews, light, mic and film b-roll, set it up on location, film in the field, organize the footage, bring it all home without losing any and edit it together into something somebody will watch. What you want is a video producer, not a studio. A good producer for you will come with the necessary equipment. That's what you should spend the money on. Enthusiastic executives and directors are plainly delusional thinking they are creative ones thinking up all the ideas. Ideas are free. Execution costs.

But, if you want to go spend some money and keep the equipment companies in business, minimum for the studio:
2 Lowel Pro lights with barndoors and gel holders with diffusion gels
2 Lowel Tota Lights
2 Photoflex PHSDMZ SilverDome NXT, Medium Softbox , 24x32x17"
2 Photoflex PHSRLTQ Speed Ring for Lowel Tota Light
2 250w lamps for Lowel Pro lights
2 500w lamps for Lowel Tota lights
4 Lowel O1-33 stands or other of your choice. If there's a hung ceiling, then 4 Lowel CM-20 scissor clamps
1 Rode NTG-1
25' Whirlwind XLR cable
1 large boom stand
1 Libec TH-650 or equivalent
30" Reflector

Any of the following cameras under $3500 as long as there's an XLR audio block, stores video on solid state media (no tape) and DOES NOT have interchangeable lenses.
Camcorders| B&H Photo Video (http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/search?ipp=100&ci=1881&Ns=p_PRICE_2%7C0&N=4256818814+4291570227+4291398147+4291296566+4291215468)

iMac Desktop or Macbook Pro 15"
Final Cut Pro X or iMovie

Steve Varnell
May 16th, 2013, 07:45 PM
I didn't see this thread was from April, but hopefully my points are helpful.

From what I am seeing, without knowing the experience of the staff running the show and matching gear to them is quite important. I think most of the advice is pretty good. The major things I have found are if there are folk who don't know how to run the equipment there to me should be a push for less expensive gear. Most of the pro stuff "is for pro's" and you might as well have amateur camera's for instance.

For instance; microphones a quite important, but you need the right mic's and recorders and of course someone who can figure that out. Since most interviews are with 2 people you need at least 2 microphones. How are they going to be used? In my experience the lapel microphone Sennheiser G3 are pretty much an industry standard, but are around $600 each. You can save and use 2 shotguns (I do like the NTG2) or 2 interview microphones and frankly either would be much more durable and easier to use. I don't like most of the consumer microphones and I don't think the risk (even with amateurs is worth it).

Since we are talking interviews here, you really want 2 cameras. 1 camera either means repeating an interview or filming both the interviewer and interviewee at the same time. 1 camera setups are very boring to watch and there is little to get around it. I know the Panasonic AG-AC90 would work well at $1750, but if you have someone how knows how to light well (and you invest into lights) you could get away with 2 consumer cameras and an external recorder. You might really be looking at wanting 3 cameras too.

I agree on the Kino-flo or Coollight clones. Really good to work with studio lights, but you are looking @ at least 2k in lights for those. You are quite likely looking at diffusion in addition to whatever lighting you get.

One thing which should also be included in the budget is a backdrop/set,

Gustavs Repse
May 22nd, 2013, 08:26 AM
Hey guys

They got the Canon 550D, as one camera, but they will be getting another one since they want to record full events in their full glory with no stops (550d 12 min filming limit).


I gave them the lists of your recomendations, and threw in my comments as well on what each of the equip does more or less.

I also stated my and your thoughts on how this process should be done, via local specialist/consulting with people who will actually do the job, filming etc.

Filming equipement is so diverse with so many different features in each individual model, that one needs to be very certain on what he actually needs for his production before buying equipement. Otherwise all the money will go into features that one might never use, as an example, buying a camera with expencive night visios/infra red capabilities :D So at this point im very reluctant to recomend anything above 1000 price point as they can't define what they specifically need and any shortcomings or missunderstandings will come back to me



I thank you all for your generous contributions to my question :)
I read them all