DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   AVCHD Format Discussion (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/avchd-format-discussion/)
-   -   Panasonic Announces HDC-DX3 and HDC-SD3 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/avchd-format-discussion/90541-panasonic-announces-hdc-dx3-hdc-sd3.html)

Paulo Teixeira April 3rd, 2007 09:07 AM

Panasonic announces HDC-DX3 and HDC-SD3
 
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...l%3fref%3dnews


http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/do...70403/pana.htm
English
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...403%2Fpana.htm

Hse Kha April 4th, 2007 04:32 AM

Thanks for the info. But what is Panasonic doing? Same bit rates and same low-res CCD chips, but now the capture res is up to 1920x1080 instead of 1440x1080.

So what is point of this? Other than giving us yet more macro-blocking compression artifacts???

Paulo Teixeira April 4th, 2007 06:52 PM

The picture quality of these camcorders will be much better than the ones it’s replacing.
http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english...070404/130166/

As some people are wondering, will Panasonic also replace the AG-HSC1U? The color reproduction of that camcorder is very good and combine it with the newer H.264 codec LSI and you almost have yourself a winner. I’ll consider it a winner if Panasonic decides to add a focusing ring around the lens.

Paulo Teixeira May 9th, 2007 03:24 PM

The watch.impress review is up:

Origional Japanese
http://www.watch.impress.co.jp/av/do...9/zooma305.htm

English translated
http://babelfish.altavista.com/babel...2Fzooma305.htm

Glen Kim May 9th, 2007 07:29 PM

I was looking at the specs of both the SD1 and SD3 the other day and had a chuckle. The "1920" seems to be the only thing different. Even the dimensions and weight are the same. That seems to indicate they neither added nor removed anything for consumers' benefit.

At the end of the day, isn't this basically just a firmware upgrade??

David Jimerson May 9th, 2007 07:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Hse Kha (Post 653609)
Thanks for the info. But what is Panasonic doing? Same bit rates and same low-res CCD chips, but now the capture res is up to 1920x1080 instead of 1440x1080.

The resolution is the same. The difference is only in the pixel aspect ratio -- 1440x1080 is 1.333; 1920x1080 is 1.000. (Multiply 1440 by 1.333 and see what you get.)

Paulo Teixeira May 9th, 2007 07:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Glen Kim (Post 676141)
At the end of the day, isn't this basically just a firmware upgrade??

http://techon.nikkeibp.co.jp/english...070404/130166/

Paulo Teixeira May 9th, 2007 08:09 PM

It’s amazing how Panasonic is offering a 0.7X wide angle lens for this. I hope it’s decent.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 05:33 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network