|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
October 13th, 2015, 03:16 PM
|
#16 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ/NYC
Posts: 563
|
Re: URSA Mini 4.6K vs 4K
It really will come down to the real world results when it's finally released. but it also will of course come down to whether you can afford it or not, or should that money be spent on other aspects of the production?
Think of digital sensors like different film stocks, they all have different looks, with RAW and other high end codecs, you do have the ability to change/alter the look, but having that solid foundation is what image makers strive for. The more information, the better, and every extra stop of dynamic range is indeed a noticeable difference in available information. Will it make or break your production? Heck no, but poor planning and poor actors and poor script sure will! |
|
|
|
October 14th, 2015, 08:28 AM
|
#17 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 404
|
Re: URSA Mini 4.6K vs 4K
What I meant is that as soon as you reach the quality offered by something like the BMPCC or the BMCC or the BMPC you shoot not worry or obsessing about getting a better image.
|
|
|
|
|
November 13th, 2015, 09:38 PM
|
#18 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 414
|
Re: URSA Mini 4.6K vs 4K
Anyone heard news on the 4.6k yet? Seems to be taking a while, maybe development problems? Of course it's no simple process to make a camera, just curious
|
|
|
|
|
November 29th, 2015, 09:18 AM
|
#19 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Perth, Western Australia
Posts: 414
|
Re: URSA Mini 4.6K vs 4K
We've Finally Got Some Brand New Blackmagic URSA Mini 4.6K Footage
Finally some movement, here's some video footage from the new sensor, sorry admin, I'm not sure on rules if you can use the link, of course your free to remove it if it doesn't comply. cheers Adam |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
