|
|
|||||||
| Canon EOS 5D Mk. II for HD All about using the Canon 5D Mk. II D-SLR for HD video recording. |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
#16 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sussex, UK
Posts: 233
|
The wonderful Kodachrome isn't great seeing the grains. Yes the sharpness does drift off, I'll have do do some calculations on a lens and find a more suitable alternative.
I do still like the idea of projecting onto the sensor so will find something that works. Been playing with projector with the LED light. If I get the led to pulse at: 1/ matched frame to the speed of the film 18fps or 2/ 30fps to match the camera I could take away the projectors shutters. I'd have to put in a brushless motor and an optical sensor for a trigger. With 555 chips it should be possible. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 10
|
This is great info. I have several Super 8 cameras as well as 16mm cameras that I plan on dusting off soon.
Quick question, you're projecting the film right onto the sensor right? So the camera has no lens? Do you put the camera in mirror lock up mode? |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Billericay, England UK
Posts: 3,761
|
If it's not in mirror lockup mode, all the light goes into the pentaprism.
Years ago I used my Canon EF (lensless, but not in mirror lockup mode of course) to copy frames of Super-8 onto Ektachrome 64 film. The Super 8 was held in a mask in my enlarger's gate, and my Canon was upside down. The tiny Super-8 frame was projected into the EF's mirror box, and the resulting 35 mm slides were far easier to print. My very high quality 50 mm Nikon enlarging lens had a beautifully flat field and very even coverage, unlike most Super-8 projection lenses. tom. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Haute Savoie ( France )
Posts: 50
|
Good thinking James. I have just got the GH1 and was going to give it a try on some telecine when I've got used to the camera and settings.
The best diy telecines I've seen have been done with a macro lens, like a few others have pointed out earlier. The thing that would concern me most about your first method of going straight to the sensor, is muck getting inside the camera. Projecting old film, no matter how clean you are, usually kicks up some dirt and debris, so having the naked camera that close to it all might cause some damage? I would have expected the rolling shutter skew to be worse than it was in your transfer, apart from the soft edges it looked very nice indeed. |
|
|
|