DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon EOS Crop Sensor for HD (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eos-crop-sensor-hd/)
-   -   7D Built-In Exposure and Focus Aids for Video? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-eos-crop-sensor-hd/467088-7d-built-exposure-focus-aids-video.html)

Keith Moreau November 3rd, 2009 09:34 PM

7D Built-In Exposure and Focus Aids for Video?
 
Just starting out with the 7D. It's nice to have a superlative SLR, I like the ergonomics and the potential.

I'm having a hard time knowing how my video is being exposed. With my camcorders there are all kinds of ways, zebras, histograms, warnings, peaking. I haven't fully explored the camera, but it seems there aren't a lot of these in video mode.

I thought I'd shortcut my own investigation a bit and ask: Does anybody have hints on how to make sure I'm not blowing out highlights or crushing blacks and if I'm in focus? Don't worry about suggesting the obvious. Maybe we can call this thread "7D Video Exposure and Focus for Dummies"

Thanks all.

Khoi Pham November 3rd, 2009 10:46 PM

One thing for sure is don't go by the metering bar, it will help keep you close but it is not 100%, and could be way off if you are shooting a white dress or a scene that has dominant dark or white, I stop using that after too many bad exposure shots, what I found best is that I use the Zacuto viewfinder to focus but also for exposured, make sure that your edit monitor is properly calibrated and hook up your camera hdmi out to it and point your camera to a scene that has highlight and shadow and adjust the lcd brightness with the Zfinder until it is as close as your edit monitor and your eyes as possible, after I've done that, I rely strictly on the Zfinder/lcd, if the scene is not right in the Zfinder then it is not right, comparing the brightness in the zfinder with my eyes and adjust until it is as close as possible, and I say about 90% of my shots are properly exposed, the other 10% I kind a knew that it might not be right but could not adjust during the shoot and just left it there, easily fix in post since it is pretty close already.

Keith Moreau November 4th, 2009 03:05 AM

Khoi, thanks for the hints.

What I'm struck with initially is, wow, that's a pretty 'manual' way to achieve correct exposure, relying on the built-in LCD. Also, I'm not actually sure what you mean by the 'metering bar.'

Keep the hints coming!

Jim Jolliffe November 4th, 2009 03:59 AM

Call me old fashioned, but try using a incident lightmeter and spot meter?

Khoi Pham November 4th, 2009 06:24 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith Moreau (Post 1442530)
Khoi, thanks for the hints.

What I'm struck with initially is, wow, that's a pretty 'manual' way to achieve correct exposure, relying on the built-in LCD. Also, I'm not actually sure what you mean by the 'metering bar.'

Keep the hints coming!

It is the bar to the right of the F stop reading on the bottom, + or - 3, or when you pressed your shutter release halfway down it activated it, when the bar is at the center it is properly exposed according the what type of metering you are using, for video there is only 1 and that is evaluative and it is not accurate on certain scene.
Jim, I'm a wedding videographer, don't have time to get a reading from a meter, sometimes you want to catch a hug or a kiss or lightning could change at the ceremony after or before the bride walking down the aisle, we can't run out there and stick a meter on their face, but if you are not shooting event, there is a histogram for playback and so you could shoot a scene and then play back and reshoot if it is not right, but we wedding videographer have to get it right the first time, you can't tell them to repeat the vows for you cuz your exposure is not right. (-:

Jerry Porter November 4th, 2009 06:35 AM

As far as exposure goes the metering bar in the live view will get you close then you can adjust with your eyes and a meter if you know how to use one. For focus the best thing to do is take the kit lens off and sell it. Then go buy some lenses that are parfocal (like the new Tamron 17-50 f2.8 and pretty much all Canon L glass) and set the focus just like you would a video camera. Zoom into your subject set your focus zoom out to the frame you want. The lack of ability to back focus was killing me.

Charles Papert November 4th, 2009 12:26 PM

There are a few ways to judge focus and exposure accurately before you roll; you can take a still and evaluate the histogram, and you can magnify the focus to make sure your subject is sharp. Obviously if your conditions change once you start rolling, exposure may be compromised and as if often the case with video, the subject may start moving!

A good solution to both is to use a good outboard monitor that has a false color exposure mode, and you will be able to judge focus that much easier. Obviously this represents an additional cash outlay but for me it is the only way to work with these DSLR's.

Using a traditional light meter with a DSLR is in my opinion pretty dicey, particularly when you are working in low light levels. The sensitivity of these cameras is such that a face metered virtually off the bottom of the meter at .7 can look pretty nice even when exposed at 2.8. The only times I use my meters on digital shoots any more is to pre-light a set.

Keith Moreau November 4th, 2009 02:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerry Porter (Post 1442568)
For focus the best thing to do is take the kit lens off and sell it. Then go buy some lenses that are parfocal (like the new Tamron 17-50 f2.8 and pretty much all Canon L glass) and set the focus just like you would a video camera. Zoom into your subject set your focus zoom out to the frame you want. The lack of ability to back focus was killing me.

Jerry, is the Canon 28-135 IS not Parfocal? I kind of like the lens but maybe not suited for manual focus -zoom in focus zoom out to frame video as you say. Have you personally noticed the Tamron is better for this?

Keith Moreau November 4th, 2009 02:59 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Charles Papert (Post 1442726)
There are a few ways to judge focus and exposure accurately before you roll; you can take a still and evaluate the histogram, and you can magnify the focus to make sure your subject is sharp.

Charles, one thing I have thought about but not yet experimented with is to establish some type of good exposure using the 7D's live still-mode (non-video) aids, such as histogram, highlight alert (akin to zebras I guess), then flipping the still/video switch over to video. I'm just wondering what results I might achieve, for example, will the equivalent ISO, aperture, and shutter that I've set in still mode apply exactly to video mode?

For example, in still mode, I establish settings to be good (no blown highlights or crushed blacks showing in histogram or zebras) to f2.8 and 1/60th and ISO 100.

I then flip the switch over to video mode, with these settings, will I get predictable results?

Thanks everybody for the great info.

Jerry Porter November 4th, 2009 03:19 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith Moreau (Post 1442779)
Jerry, is the Canon 28-135 IS not Parfocal? I kind of like the lens but maybe not suited for manual focus -zoom in focus zoom out to frame video as you say. Have you personally noticed the Tamron is better for this?

No it is not. The only Canon lenses that I know of that are Parfocal, are the L series lenses. The Tamron works very well for this at about half the cost of the Canons.

Khoi Pham November 4th, 2009 03:22 PM

My 17-55 IS 2.8 is parfocal.
Keith, you can do that but for me just way too long.

Jerry Porter November 4th, 2009 03:41 PM

Keith,
I don't know if you know this, forgive me if this seems very basic to you. But, on the kit lens after you focus, if you change your zoom at all the lens is out of focus again. On the lower end lenses I guess Canon figured (and everyone else) that everyone would use auto focus. Eliminating the need for the Parfocal lenses.

Keith Moreau November 4th, 2009 04:02 PM

Jerry, no answer is too basic in this thread, as I said, 'for dummies.' I haven't had time to put the Canon kit lens through it's paces regarding 'parfocalness' but I believe you. I just got my new Tamron 2.8 17-50 VR IS lens, are you using that one and how do you like it?

Kin Lau November 4th, 2009 04:08 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Keith Moreau (Post 1442783)
For example, in still mode, I establish settings to be good (no blown highlights or crushed blacks showing in histogram or zebras) to f2.8 and 1/60th and ISO 100.

I then flip the switch over to video mode, with these settings, will I get predictable results?

Thanks everybody for the great info.

Just remember that the settings will only hold in M mode and not in any of the other modes.

Brian Ford November 4th, 2009 06:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jerry Porter (Post 1442568)
that are parfocal (like the new Tamron 17-50 f2.8 and pretty much all Canon L glass)

Is the non VC version of that Tamron lens parfocal?


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 07:36 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network