|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 9th, 2010, 11:33 AM
|
#1 |
|
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3
|
which wide angle?
Seriously considering buying the tamron as a less expensive wide angle/multi purpose lens. I have read many good reviews about its great quality for price but am always looking for more input. Im also thinking bout saving up a bit more for the canon 10-22 or maybe the 16-35 instead.. Keep in mind im a student on a somewhat tighter budget.
thanks |
|
|
|
April 9th, 2010, 11:35 AM
|
#2 |
|
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 3
|
is it worth saving up for the 16-35? i forgot to add
|
|
|
|
|
April 9th, 2010, 11:49 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Gothenburg, Sweden
Posts: 259
|
i have been using the Canon 10-22mm and have been really impressed.
|
|
|
|
|
April 9th, 2010, 05:28 PM
|
#4 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,389
|
If you can find one, the Tokina 11-16 is stunning!
__________________
The older I get, the better I was! |
|
|
|
|
April 9th, 2010, 06:33 PM
|
#5 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Lipa City Batangas, Philippines
Posts: 1,110
|
I just got the Canon 10 - 22mm lens yesterday. Wasn't even planning to buy a lens, but the shop owner had one of these and let me try it out. As soon as I got over saying "Wow!" I bought it immediately.
Richard |
|
|
|
|
April 9th, 2010, 09:39 PM
|
#6 |
|
Contributor
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 4,449
|
I've seen some very nice shots from the Canon 16-35. For a good lower budget wide angle, there's also the Tokina 16-50, which is what I've been using. It's good and sharp wide open (it's a full f2.8 lens) but seems to get a little soft when zoomed in all the way to 50mm at 2.8. I bought it for wide angle use, so that's not a problem for me.
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
