Steve Maller |
June 30th, 2009 09:50 AM |
Quote:
Originally Posted by Glen Elliott
(Post 1165003)
Nice! There are moments that video can capture that photos simply can't- especially when relating to audio.
Btw, do you feel that more photographers are getting into video or vice versa (videographers getting into photography) as a result of this camera?
|
Good question. I can't speak from the perspective of a videographer. Although I do a lot of video work, it's generally studio-type stuff, as opposed to run-and-gun work that would be a more logical overlap with the 5D Mark II. That said, even that type of work has many advantages with the 5D Mark II. I had a recent job across the country to do some documentary work, and rather than schlep my Canon XL2 and associated gear, I decided to take a chance and shoot it all on the 5D Mark II. And it was a huge success. The client loved what they got, and I was very happy.
With respect to the still photographer's perspective, I definitely think there are great opportunities. The major challenge is delivery, as a traditional DVD is really a poor showcase for what this camera will do. I'm finding that delivering a CD of 720P Quicktime videos is a good vehicle. But this is definitely in flux. I also enjoy showing off my work on my iPod Touch. I am also finding this as a "value add" as opposed to a new item on the price list. It's a nice competitive advantage, but most consumers are somewhat uninformed (understandably so) as to the value inherent in cinematic video coverage.
|