Back up 5D footage - Page 2 at

Go Back   DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon EOS Full Frame for HD

Canon EOS Full Frame for HD
All about using the Canon 1D X, 6D, 5D Mk. IV / Mk. III / Mk. II D-SLR for 4K and HD video recording.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old November 3rd, 2010, 10:28 AM   #16
Inner Circle
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Norwich, Norfolk, UK
Posts: 3,517
Originally Posted by Daniel Browning View Post
Yes, and that would work great if 200 GB/tape is sufficient. For 2TB backed up in triplicate, that takes 30 tapes, compared to just three $99 hard drives. Personally, I have 6 TB backed up in triplicate, and I don't consider that to be a lot.
Used tapes can be found for less than $10 delivered but I can see that I am not going to convince you of the merits of tape:-) One of the biggest arguments in favour of tapes is their long shelf life & one of the biggest arguments against is speed compared to disks. Tapes are also nicer for backing up on a per project basis as 200GB would amount to about 10 hours of video from a Canon DSLR which is far more than we would have for a typical project but I would be reluctant to use just one hard disk per project as it would be more expensive & bulky.
Nigel Barker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old November 3rd, 2010, 06:47 PM   #17
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: York, England
Posts: 1,323
Originally Posted by Daniel Browning View Post
Well, I wont comment on the reliability aspect, but I will say something about the cost. Every time I've looked into tape backup, it came out much more expensive.

HP LTO4 800 GB backup drive and SAS card: $2,400
20 tapes (16 TB): $600

That's $188/TB, over three times as much as 2TB hard drives:
External e-sata hard drive docking station: $30
Eight 2TB drives ($100/each at the time of this writing): $800

The less tapes you use, the more lopsided the comparison:

HP LTO4 800 GB backup drive and SAS card: $2,400
7 tapes (5.6 TB): $175

That's $460/TB, while the 6TB of hard drives is only $55/TB, so in that scenario it's 8 times cheaper. The tape drive would have to be $155 in order to match the cost of hard drives for 6 TB of backup (2 TB in triplicate). But even the cheapest ones are ten times that amount.

If all you ever need is 16TB then tape is not for you. I have much more than 16TB and it's growing rapidly. HDDs are simply not cost effective once you get in to large amounts of footage.

Also, recalculate for more than one backup, maybe three. So 16TBx3 = 48TB. Now imagine 64TBx3 = 192TB. Hard Disks = $10,560

The Tape solution (using your numbers) = $2,400 + $7,200 = $9,600.

Now imagine 150TB or 300TB backup up x3.

If you don't shoot much, or don't need to retain footage for more than the length of the project then tape is probably not for you. If you need to archive footage for future reference then tape is a viable and possible cheaper solution than hard disks.

Imagine broadcasters than need to store petabytes of footage. Do you imagine they have lots of hard disks sat on a shelf? ;)
Qualified UAV Pilot with CAA PFAW
Aerial Photo / Aerial Video | Corporate Video Production
Dave Partington is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

(800) 223-2500
New York, NY

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Texas Media Systems
(512) 440-1400
Austin, TX

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

(800) 323-2325
Mineola, NY

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon EOS Full Frame for HD

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:32 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2018 The Digital Video Information Network