All-I vs. IPB
Hello...
Whats the latest about this... is All-I just better for native editing or is the images better too? |
Re: All-I vs. IPB
The image doesn't look any better. It just fills up the cards 3x as fast.
|
Re: All-I vs. IPB
Quote:
|
Re: All-I vs. IPB
Sorry I don't have a link to share for reference, but seems like I recall seeing where All-I performed better in low light/hi ISO situations showing less noise than IPB.
If I stumble across the comparison I'll come back and post a link. |
Re: All-I vs. IPB
It fills up the card faster but it is so much nicer to edit natively. I think the benefit to workflow far outweigh the added space.
|
Re: All-I vs. IPB
Quote:
My NLE is Edius and the All-I works really nice... how is it in FCP7 (some of my clients still use it)? |
Re: All-I vs. IPB
Quote:
|
Re: All-I vs. IPB
Quote:
|
Re: All-I vs. IPB
I am missing the reference but it was once claimed that Canons use the most simple compression known to man. There are, say, 15 kinds and they use the worst. Now, it seems, there is a new form of compression that should be delightfully better. Right?
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:43 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network