How do you like miniDV?
I am considering purchasing the HV20. I am concerned about the media: miniDV. How do you HV20 owners like it? How are you converting to DVD, or are you just holding onto the tapes until a convenient high def DVD burning system is available? Do you think the quality is better than miniDVD? And now that AVCHD is out, should I be looking for a camera with AVCHD that records to a disc instead of going with miniDV? Thanks for your help!
Shirley |
Quote:
When flash cards are cheaper and the codecs are better, I'll switch. Maybe that will be the HG20 or HG30. |
Thanks, Daniel! How do you archive your footage, or are you just keeping your recordings on the miniDV for now?
Shirley |
Quote:
An external 500 GB drive would be enough for most people ($300 in total), but even 2TB arrays are getting pretty inexpensive. |
Quote:
To answer the original poster, the tapes are an extremely reliable solution for backing up your "master" footage - certainly more reliable than a hard drive or a home-burned DVD. When I was looking at the HV20 in the spring, I considered the tapes a major downside. Now that I'm actually using it, I'm really glad I went the tape route (vs. hard drive). Of course it would be nice to have drag-and-drop copying functionality, but the image quality and automatic master storage advantages of the tapes are much more important to me. |
reliability of tapes
I had the same opinion when I bought a canon HV10 just one year ago, now I'm less sure about the reliability.
Although I use exclusively Sony HDV tapes in order to minimize dropouts, my camera generates a dropout roughly every 5 minutes of footage, and there is no way to retrieve the damaged pictures. I noticed that the frequency of occurrence of these dropouts varies of lot from one cassette to another one, even of the same brand and model. Since in the past I had similar problems with a Standard miniDV Canon, I don't feel so safe with tapes. I already posted about this problem, but it seems it is not so common and I can't realize why. Marco |
I personally do not like tape systems, however I do use them because this is the norm for now. I have written an "HDV vs AVCHD" blog article here:
http://eugenia.gnomefiles.org/2007/09/30/hdv-vs-avchd/ |
Quote:
MPEG-4 is a winner in sat video delivery and may become a preferred way in cable video delivery (thank you, now you can throw out your QAM receiver), but the situation is not that obvious for acquisition and editing. So far HDV is a better all around standard. I don't know why camcorder manufacturers use small 30-60GB drives while Apple uses 160GB drives? In regards to HDDs, I don't really like them because they have mechanical parts. And they are not removable. Adding insult to injury, many camcorders equipped with an HDD and with a memory card slot do not allow transferring files from HDD to a card. What's up with that? Get real people, you are not making just cameras anymore, you are making computers with lenses, so make them behave like proper computers do. I'll wait for $10 16GB memory cards, until then I will be using tapes. |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:42 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network