Canon HV series -- various sample clips

Ken Ross · March 15th, 2007, 03:31 PM

Nice Chris, thanks. Couldn't find those guys no matter how I searched the site.

James Burland · March 21st, 2007, 04:28 PM

http://blip.tv/file/get/TheCreativeL...In720HD465.mov

I guess it's primarily because I've moved up to the HV10 from an old Canon camcorder, rather than down from a high-end HD video camera - but to me the HV10 produces amazing results! This Macro footage poses wonderful subtle tones and huge scoops of detail, it's the perfect camera for this kind of 'close up' product shot.

I'm heading out to Hong Kong in a few weeks and I'm wondering if I should pick up an HV20, but will it really be that much better than what the HV10 can produce?

Dino Leone · March 21st, 2007, 05:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Burland

I guess it's primarily because I've moved up to the HV10 from an old Canon camcorder, rather than down from a high-end HD video camera - but to me the HV10 produces amazing results! This Macro footage poses wonderful subtle tones and huge scoops of detail, it's the perfect camera for this kind of 'close up' product shot.

James,
Very beautiful footage. Very sharp too. What worries me are those interlace artifacts whenever there's movement - those are not so nice... I wonder if they'd go away when shooting at 30F?

Dino

Brad Vaughan · March 21st, 2007, 05:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by James Burland

but to me the HV10 produces amazing results!

HV10 and amazing results....you better believe it! I love my Hv10 too!

Image quality wise I don't think you'll see much difference between the 10 and 20 in daylight/brightlight recordings. In lowlight situations is were you will see the difference from what I gather.

Anyway, I'll be very happy with my HV10 for some time to come.

Thanks for another great looking vid.

btw, what's with the Rally Racing game footage at the end? Did that sneak in there on ya? :)

Fergus Anderson · March 22nd, 2007, 03:27 PM

HV20 raw 24p (60i) sample (not mine!) without with the cine preset - just automatic:

http://www.youngsterproduction.com/v...hv20%20raw.m2t

If anyone can tell me how to render as true 24p in vegas I would appreciate it
(remove the 2:3 pulldown)

The interlacing is because of standard pulldown added to the 24p for 1080i standards compatibility.
What will be the case with 25p PAL raw footage? Will that show interlacing? Will VLC be able to play it as true 25p?

Tony Tibbetts · March 22nd, 2007, 03:35 PM

Hmmm... the link doesn't seem to work.

Enea Lanzarone · March 22nd, 2007, 03:47 PM

I figured out the correct link:

http://www.youngsterproduction.com/v...hv20%20raw.m2t

Robert Batta · March 25th, 2007, 05:49 AM

left: HC7
right: HV20

http://plusd.itmedia.co.jp/lifestyle...news032_3.html

Dan Peterson · March 25th, 2007, 03:25 PM

Thanks for this. But what I'd really like is a side-by-side comparison of some raw video.

Ken Ross · March 25th, 2007, 05:24 PM

Although I'm not a big believer in derterming quality soley by still grabs, the HV20 is obviously sharper in those pictures.

Glen Kim · March 25th, 2007, 05:48 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Ken Ross

Although I'm not a big believer in derterming quality soley by still grabs, the HV20 is obviously sharper in those pictures.

I totally agree. Having said that, the low light comparison (the pic with the snooker table) was a lot clearer on the HV20. The HC7 was very noisy. I'd love to see the original video of those caps.

Leila Alkadi · March 25th, 2007, 09:03 PM

Although I returned both the HC7 and the HV20, my vote
would definitely go to the HV20.

The HV20's pictures(video or still photo) had a lot less noise
when compared side-by-side in low-light situations. The room
where I did the comparison only had one 100W bulb.

Taylor Wigton · March 28th, 2007, 12:07 AM

http://447productions.com/HV20_24p_1920x1080.mov (115mb)

here it is.... before posting this link, I downloaded it from the above link onto my 13" Macbook, which is alot smaller then the "Actual" size of the QT movie. It looked alot more pixelated the the same QT file on my desktop, even at that size.

After 8 minutes or so it was downloaded, and I clicked on the screen which the movie on it and right clicked to get a small dropdown window which gave me a few options. I selected "SAVE AS QUICKTIME MOVIE" onto my desktop and when I double clicked the newly saved movie, everything was exactly as the original file that I uploaded. And of course for those with a smaller screen, the best option is under the Quicktime menu, View as "Half Size." From there, I suppose DVI out to a larger 1080 HDTV? Hope this helps.

Alan Dunkel · March 28th, 2007, 12:23 AM

Taylor,
...very good PF24 example. Thanks for posting. Alan

James Burland · March 28th, 2007, 08:14 AM

Wow! Have you noticed how many people are viewing this corner of the DV Info right now, 47 at the time of posting!

I guess it must be all the interest in the HV20

Anyway, here is another sample from the HV10

http://blip.tv/file/get/TheCreativeL...talZoom868.m4v

March 21st, 2007, 04:28 PM	#32
James Burland Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Weymouth, UK Posts: 29	More Canon HV10 footage - bucket loads of detail! http://blip.tv/file/get/TheCreativeL...In720HD465.mov I guess it's primarily because I've moved up to the HV10 from an old Canon camcorder, rather than down from a high-end HD video camera - but to me the HV10 produces amazing results! This Macro footage poses wonderful subtle tones and huge scoops of detail, it's the perfect camera for this kind of 'close up' product shot. I'm heading out to Hong Kong in a few weeks and I'm wondering if I should pick up an HV20, but will it really be that much better than what the HV10 can produce?

March 22nd, 2007, 03:27 PM	#35
Fergus Anderson Major Player Join Date: Nov 2006 Location: London, UK Posts: 321	HV20 raw 24p (60i) HV20 raw 24p (60i) sample (not mine!) without with the cine preset - just automatic: http://www.youngsterproduction.com/v...hv20%20raw.m2t If anyone can tell me how to render as true 24p in vegas I would appreciate it (remove the 2:3 pulldown) The interlacing is because of standard pulldown added to the 24p for 1080i standards compatibility. What will be the case with 25p PAL raw footage? Will that show interlacing? Will VLC be able to play it as true 25p?

March 25th, 2007, 05:49 AM	#38
Robert Batta Regular Crew Join Date: May 2006 Location: Hungary / Europe Posts: 128	HV20 vs HC7 left: HC7 right: HV20 http://plusd.itmedia.co.jp/lifestyle...news032_3.html __________________ Robert Batta my stock video portfolio : https://www.pond5.com/artist/skysuta Pond5 – the world’s first web-based stock footage marketplace –

March 28th, 2007, 12:07 AM	#43
Taylor Wigton Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: Los Angeles, CA Posts: 50	HV20 Clip (24p) FULL RES 1920x1080 http://447productions.com/HV20_24p_1920x1080.mov (115mb) here it is.... before posting this link, I downloaded it from the above link onto my 13" Macbook, which is alot smaller then the "Actual" size of the QT movie. It looked alot more pixelated the the same QT file on my desktop, even at that size. After 8 minutes or so it was downloaded, and I clicked on the screen which the movie on it and right clicked to get a small dropdown window which gave me a few options. I selected "SAVE AS QUICKTIME MOVIE" onto my desktop and when I double clicked the newly saved movie, everything was exactly as the original file that I uploaded. And of course for those with a smaller screen, the best option is under the Quicktime menu, View as "Half Size." From there, I suppose DVI out to a larger 1080 HDTV? Hope this helps. __________________ Taylor Wigton DP, Los Angeles

March 28th, 2007, 12:23 AM	#44
Alan Dunkel Regular Crew Join Date: Sep 2003 Location: San Mateo, CA Posts: 59	Even better full res ... Taylor, ...very good PF24 example. Thanks for posting. Alan

March 15th, 2007, 03:31 PM	#31
Ken Ross Trustee Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New York Posts: 1,945	Nice Chris, thanks. Couldn't find those guys no matter how I searched the site.

March 22nd, 2007, 03:35 PM	#36
Tony Tibbetts Major Player Join Date: Aug 2005 Posts: 385	Hmmm... the link doesn't seem to work.

March 22nd, 2007, 03:47 PM	#37
Enea Lanzarone Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Switzerland Posts: 53	I figured out the correct link: http://www.youngsterproduction.com/v...hv20%20raw.m2t

March 25th, 2007, 03:25 PM	#39
Dan Peterson Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Lake County, IL Posts: 59	Thanks for this. But what I'd really like is a side-by-side comparison of some raw video.

March 25th, 2007, 05:24 PM	#40
Ken Ross Trustee Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: New York Posts: 1,945	Although I'm not a big believer in derterming quality soley by still grabs, the HV20 is obviously sharper in those pictures.

March 25th, 2007, 09:03 PM	#42
Leila Alkadi Regular Crew Join Date: Jan 2007 Location: Washington Posts: 49	Although I returned both the HC7 and the HV20, my vote would definitely go to the HV20. The HV20's pictures(video or still photo) had a lot less noise when compared side-by-side in low-light situations. The room where I did the comparison only had one 100W bulb.

March 28th, 2007, 08:14 AM	#45
James Burland Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: Weymouth, UK Posts: 29	New HV10 footage - low light and digital zoom Wow! Have you noticed how many people are viewing this corner of the DV Info right now, 47 at the time of posting! I guess it must be all the interest in the HV20 Anyway, here is another sample from the HV10 http://blip.tv/file/get/TheCreativeL...talZoom868.m4v