HPX500 vs XF300/305 at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon XF Series 4K and HD Camcorders

Canon XF Series 4K and HD Camcorders
Canon XF705, XF405, XF305, XF205 and XF105 (with SDI), Canon XF400, XF300, XF200 and XF100 (without SDI).

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old December 18th, 2010, 08:08 PM   #1
Space Hipster
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 1,596
HPX500 vs XF300/305

Anyone have a chance to use these two cams? Which would you prefer?
Glen Vandermolen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 18th, 2010, 10:22 PM   #2
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 1,384
apples and oranges...I don't really see these two being compared as they are so completely different.
The only thing you probably could compare is the final picture quality.

I cant really speak for the Panny picture quality but based on the specs, I have no doubt it's great. I've used all the panny cameras from the 200 down to the hmc40.

As for the XF, every time I use it I know I made the right decision for the money spent. I can't really find anything to complain about other than the on/off switch. I prefer the smaller form factor and attach part of my dslr rig if I need to shoulder it. The image stabilization and face detection AF mode are just awesome. Using CF cards is a major plus to me as they are much easier on the wallet than P2. I load mine with 2 top shelf San Disk 32gb cards and I have a 3 more 32gb and a few 16gb for the price of a couple of big P2's. Then there's the fact that the CF cards are easy to transfer to any computer with a simple card reader. The only advantage of P2 to me is with FCP there's no need to transcode. Though since I can edit natively with the Canon's MXF files, not that big a difference.
Picture-wise, it's got an edge over the EX1r which I think it was aimed at. And it blows the lens off the hvx200 which I have a lot of time on. Seems the 500 is several notches above the 200 so as I mentioned, that might be a fair comparo pic-wise. But since everything else is so different, I think your first decision would have to be form factor. And then that other minor difference, price. You could get a XF300 and a XF100 for the price of the 500. And that is a deal I'd take but only cause I prefer smaller cameras.
A7RII, C100, 1Dx, 5Dmk3, 70D, Kessler goodies, Adobe, Pro Tools and more!
Robert Turchick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old December 19th, 2010, 04:11 AM   #3
Major Player
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Slovenia
Posts: 356
I've edited HPX500 material and seen some raw XF300 fotage. The XF is sharper. The HPX has more dynamic range and a more pleasing picture. I wouldn't use the HPX for 1080p broadcast. In my opinion the 720p is the sweet spot for the HPX.
Sanjin Svajger is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

(800) 223-2500
New York, NY

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Texas Media Systems
(512) 440-1400
Austin, TX

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

(800) 323-2325
Mineola, NY

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon XF Series 4K and HD Camcorders

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:03 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2018 The Digital Video Information Network