DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xh-series-hdv-camcorders/)
-   -   Re-using of tapes (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/canon-xh-series-hdv-camcorders/100403-re-using-tapes.html)

Ger Griffin August 3rd, 2007 07:17 AM

Re-using of tapes
 
hey guys,
just need some opinions on the re-using of
PANASONIC AY-DVM63AMQ
these are the master quality ones (the best apparently) or any other type of hdv mini dv tapes for that matter.

Is it defeating the whole purpose of paying the big bucks to begin with?

should these tapes be used once only?

I mean its not gold dust im filming, but i dont want artefacts either.

im just preparing to start as i intend to go on with this beautiful camera.

David Warren August 3rd, 2007 07:20 AM

i used to always say that you can use a tape about 3 or 4 times before losing any sort of quality.. though really there will never be any loss of 'quality' as its DIGITAL.. you just may get more dropouts or timecode issues etc.. from the wear on the tape mostly.. i buy the cheaper fuji hdv tapes ($6.50 canadian each).. i always use a new tape for serious projects but re-use tapes for 'for fun' projects..

Don Palomaki August 3rd, 2007 09:14 AM

The questions for tape reuse are several.

The increased likelihood of unintentionally taping over something you really wanted to save.

The possibility of deciding at a later, but oo late, that you really wanted to archive something after all.

The question of whether or not the camcorder record current is strong enough to completely erase and record over previously recorded material. (This is not an issue with blank tape, but might be an increased issue with tapes previously recorded in a different machine with a slightly different head alignment). People have occasionally reported seeing flashes of previously record material when playing a SD tape, probably due to an incomplete erase/record over previous material. Why this happens is a good question - maybe due to transient dirt on the head during record.

Tape wear is usually the least of issues, especially if using NLE, because the tape usually does not spend much time under a spinning head with no tape movement. This was more of an issue in the days of linear editing.

Tape is cheap by comparison to virtually all other factors in video production, especially TIME.

So you have to evaluate the risks and cost, and do what works for you. I use new tape for all capture, but will reuse tape for scratch and practice purposes.

Bill Pryor August 3rd, 2007 09:30 AM

I use only new tapes, but on occasion I may reuse a tape for something non-critical. The AMQ tapes are $8 to $9 at most places, so the cost of tape is not really much of a factor. On a typical shoot we probably spend more on coffee and donuts and bottled water and pizza than on tape.

Jason Sovey August 3rd, 2007 10:02 AM

I'm curious if anyone has ever tried bulk erasing a mini-DV tape. When I worked in radio, we would erase our broadcast cartridges (carts) and reel to reel tapes on a electromagnet device. The tapes were heavy duty for recording analog audio, and meant to be reused.

If someone is using blacked and coded dv tapes, it would wipe the time coding, but it should also eliminate the possibility of having previously recorded material reappear during subsequent playback.

For DV, is this a bad idea, or are they too delicate?

Eric Weiss August 3rd, 2007 10:27 AM

Tape is so cheap and hard drives can be so volatile, that I always use a fresh tape.
It’s just worth it to me to have multiple archives of my work. I’ve lost a lot of drives, but never a tape. The only good thing that can come from reusing a tape is cost savings of a few bucks. If you can afford an A1, use a new tape.

Steven Taylor August 3rd, 2007 10:39 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Eric Weiss (Post 722895)
If you can afford an A1, use a new tape.

hmm, that logic isn't strictly true. Now I've afforded an A1 I'll not be affording anything else for a year without problems ;)

Chris Hurd August 3rd, 2007 10:53 AM

Well that logic isn't *strictly* true... but it *should* be... at any rate, I have to agree that even the costliest HDV tape is still the single least expensive link in the production chain, so why skimp on it; why re-use it, and why use anything but the best? It's a matter of placing a value on the video that you're shooting... I'd never use anything but the best, most expensive tape I could find. Cheap tape should be avoided like the plague. And if I point an A1 at something, it's serious enough that I'm going to keep that video. For home / family / vacation / tourist stuff, I use the movie mode in my little PowerShot SD800 IS for casual video recording.

Taky Cheung August 3rd, 2007 11:32 AM

I reuse each tape for 2 or 3 times. I shoot weddings using 2 cameras. A full day work gives me about 16 to 20 tapes. The cost adds up. Since I have multiple angles, if there are some drop outs, not too big of a deal for me.

When I finish a project, I export all final videos back to those old tapes for archiving.

Eric Weiss August 3rd, 2007 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taky Cheung (Post 722939)
I reuse each tape for 2 or 3 times........ if there are some drop outs, not too big of a deal for me.

So Taky, there are increased dropouts?

Taky Cheung August 3rd, 2007 11:59 AM

I don't notice there is an increase drop out. Even for new tape, there might be 1 or 2 either at the beginning or the end of a tape recording. It's like completely random

Ger Griffin August 3rd, 2007 04:24 PM

"The increased likelihood of unintentionally taping over something you really wanted to save"

Don that is a very good point.
especially since I'll be shooting in hdv but outputting to sd.
Who knows what may come of this footage down the road.

So I think based on this factor among the more technical ones
also I'll shoot on new tapes all the time.
I'll store these tapes under the perfect storage conditions
and if the time comes to call up one of them they'll be there.

Im sure ill find a use for at least some of them at some stage
for second cameras etc., backing up edited projects etc.

I do agree that comparitively speaking it is one of the cheapest
outlays we have and if quality is important one shouldnt cut costs here.

I usually shoot single camera event stuff which means no second chance!

Thanks for your comments and helping me decide.

Bill Watson August 3rd, 2007 07:29 PM

I do short clips on the A1 for our local TV News each week.

I use standard mini DV tapes (always have) and don't see any problem re-using them.

These tapes are used in my camera, then played back on another one in the pre-edit, and then played on a tape machine in the studio.

I'm basically using three in rotation and will let you all know when I start seeing any dropouts or any other problems.

Bill Busby August 3rd, 2007 07:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Taky Cheung (Post 722939)
I reuse each tape for 2 or 3 times. I shoot weddings using 2 cameras. A full day work gives me about 16 to 20 tapes. The cost adds up.

Are you serious? So equally divided, that's 8 to 10 tapes/hours per cam on a typical wedding gig day?

Bill

Steven Taylor August 4th, 2007 04:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Chris Hurd (Post 722915)
Well that logic isn't *strictly* true... but it *should* be... at any rate, I have to agree that even the costliest HDV tape is still the single least expensive link in the production chain, so why skimp on it

Tapes are more expensive in the UK. I'm using the white Sony HDV tapes which cost as much as $20 each here. I buy the ones at slightly suspicious prices on amazon z-shops and ebay..


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:27 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network