Wide Angle Adaptor for XH A1? - Page 19 at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon HDV and DV Camera Systems > Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders

Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders
Canon XH G1S / G1 (with SDI), Canon XH A1S / A1 (without SDI).


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old September 19th, 2007, 10:40 AM   #271
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rock Hill, S.C.
Posts: 57
Steve, I appreciate your reply. It helped.

I really discourages me that so many people could have looked at this thread but yet not be willing to even throw out an opinion.
Christopher Neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2007, 01:17 PM   #272
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Milwaukee, Wisconsin
Posts: 50
i have the canon wd-72. i love the lense but i am very wary about using it because i cannot place a filter in front of it without buying a matte box. i had seen one a few days ago that said that it was compatible with the wd-72. ill see if i cant find it again and get back to you.

**edit** http://www.cinetactics.com/Detail.bok?no=15
here is a link for one that the manufacturer claims will work with the wd-72. it is cheap enough so i think that i may pick it up and see.
Rob Stoner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 19th, 2007, 01:44 PM   #273
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rock Hill, S.C.
Posts: 57
I had looked at that one, but just wasn't sure. If you decide to buy one, please let me know what you think of it. I really liked that it was collapsible to fit in bags.
Christopher Neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 11:11 AM   #274
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Iowa City, Iowa
Posts: 670
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christopher Neville View Post
Steve, I appreciate your reply. It helped.

I really discourages me that so many people could have looked at this thread but yet not be willing to even throw out an opinion.
Consider that some viewers might have a similar question and are looking for an answer themselves. There are several good threads already on the merits of the WD-H72 that could inform your decision, so you might try the search.

As far as a trade-off between wide angle vs. polarizer, your shooting needs and priorities could answer that. Isn't there a screw-on filter out there that you could mount the adapter to? Haven't tried this myself, but I may.
__________________
youtube.com/benhillmedia
linkedin.com/in/benhillmedia
Benjamin Hill is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 11:33 AM   #275
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
Chrisopher, i hear ya but there there are not too many options for this.
The WD-72 is the ideal choice and is worth having for other applications.
for this specific application, you will need a giant polarizer and box with the WD-72. it will be a front-heavy monster that i ceratinly would not be dragging around al fresco.

You can also buy a lesser brand WA with front threads and matching polarizer, which may slightly besmirch your image. Search around here and you will see the ones that were discussed.

with the gl2, i used the canon WA and put the polarizer on before the WA with great results. with an xl1-s, the WA 3x lens had front threads..so, my ass is a little chapped over this too.

on the upside, the A1 is pretty damn wide. for such shots that would need
a polarizer, i've just shot without a WA and did just fine.
Eric Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 05:27 PM   #276
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Rock Hill, S.C.
Posts: 57
Eric, the added weight of the matte box and filter is something I hadn't considered in addition to the wd-h72 weight. That might add up to enough to make roaming around falls and rocks for different angles a bit tough.

I had wondered about attaching a polarizer, then the wd-h72, but I wasn't sure how sturdy that would be since the filter rotates. I also wasn't sure about how mounting the wd-h72 to a filter would affect it's use. From what you said, it sounds like you had good results with that.
Christopher Neville is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 05:34 PM   #277
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Philly,PA
Posts: 360
i do that with a gl2, not an a1. the a1 wd mount is different.

i'm saying.. i think there are some third party lightweight WA's for the A1 with front threads. i don't own any, but some people on here do.

you'd probably have to do something like this

http://www.schneideroptics.com/centu...h-g1/xh-g1.htm
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...olarizing.html

but, i'd really just try shooting some waterfalls without a WA first. trust me, that stock lens is pretty wide, crisp, and 72mm polarizers are easy to come by.
Eric Weiss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 20th, 2007, 07:52 PM   #278
New Boot
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Palo Alto CA
Posts: 21
I have the Century .8x and it's awesome. Small and lighter than the Canon, and shows minimal barrel distortion (considering the A1's built-in lens already distorts a lot).

It has an 86mm front thread. With all wide angle lenses, you run the risk of vignetting when putting a polarizer on the front. I tried a standard polarizer on my Century and saw a slight vignette. So I returned the polarizer and am contemplating purchasing a slim polarizer designed for wide angle lenses.

Hope this helps. I've struggled with the wide angle / polarizer set up myself. Other alternative is to spring for a matte box and polarizer, which, although expensive, could be used with future cameras.
__________________
Localfilms.org
Peter Jordan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 9th, 2007, 12:09 PM   #279
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 153
What Wide Angle lens if good for the A1?

Had a Vitacon 0.5X WA attached with the Macro lens. Well, the macro lens is pretty good, very shallow DOF. However the WA is giving me lots of Vignetting. Zoom out to remove it is ineffective and as I might as well use the fixed lens.
Anyone can recommend any 0.7X or 0.5X WA for the A1 without any vignetting? Good price preferably. Thanks. :)
Kenny Shem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 9th, 2007, 02:05 PM   #280
Wrangler
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 4,294
Folks report good results with the Canon WD-H72.

However, are you proposing to stack adapters?
__________________
dpalomaki@dspalomaki.com
Don Palomaki is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 9th, 2007, 03:12 PM   #281
Sponsor: TapeWorks Texas
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 357
Kenny,

Schneider/Century Optics has the following available

0HD-06WA-XLH .6X WIDE ANGLE ADAPT HD CANON
http://www.schneideroptics.com/ecomm...=1385&IID=6219

0VS-08CV-72 .8X HD W/A CONVERTER 72MM
http://www.schneideroptics.com/ecomm...=1075&IID=2974

Have always heard great responses on their products.

Scott Cantrell
TapeWorks Texas Inc - HDVinfo Sponser
Scott Cantrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 9th, 2007, 06:24 PM   #282
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Burbank
Posts: 1,811
I have this .6x from Century. It works very well:
http://www.schneideroptics.com/ecomm...=1385&IID=6219

It is the same as the one sold before by Century, but it has differences in the mounting mechanisms for the XH camera.

It is also fairly lightweight.

(This is the first one listed in the post above.)
Jack Walker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 10th, 2007, 03:32 AM   #283
Major Player
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Munich Germany , Singapore ,NSW Australia
Posts: 419
The .6x from Century is also not a zoom through W.A lens. only the higher priced ones are.

For $399 the Canon WD-H72. is the best in it's class. It is also a zoom through and it comes with a sun shade too.
David Chia is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 10th, 2007, 06:26 AM   #284
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Walker View Post
I have this .6x from Century. It works very well:
http://www.schneideroptics.com/ecomm...=1385&IID=6219

It is the same as the one sold before by Century, but it has differences in the mounting mechanisms for the XH camera.

It is also fairly lightweight.

(This is the first one listed in the post above.)
May I know how heavy is it? I'm using it with Merlin so weight is pretty important I guess. Does it need any step up/down rings to be mounted onto the A1 and is there any vignetting when zoom out? Thanks.
Kenny Shem is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 10th, 2007, 06:30 AM   #285
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Singapore
Posts: 153
Quote:
Originally Posted by Don Palomaki View Post
Folks report good results with the Canon WD-H72.

However, are you proposing to stack adapters?
I only had a UV filter attached to my camera lens.
Kenny Shem is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Z.G.C.
(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Canon EOS / MXF / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Canon HDV and DV Camera Systems > Canon XH Series HDV Camcorders

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



Google
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:03 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2017 The Digital Video Information Network