Macro comparison with and without WA adapter at DVinfo.net

Chris Hurd · November 30th, 2006, 06:53 PM

Just to give you an idea of how the macro capability compares with and without the wide angle adapter. The cup is held at an angle to show just how shallow D.O.F. is when working with macro (basically in macro mode, shallow depth of field is your enemy). This is rather unscientific; it's intended only to show how different the fields of view are. Apologies for the handheld, unprecise positioning. We'll do this again the right way later on. In both images the focus distance to the blue dots below the "R" is about 20mm. Iris f/1.6, shutter 1/60, gain 0db. Photos recorded to SD card. Compare these with the same images from the XL HD 20x and 6x lenses at http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?p=582131.

November 30th, 2006, 06:53 PM	#1
Chris Hurd Obstreperous Rex Join Date: Jan 2001 Location: San Marcos, TX Posts: 23,178 Images: 513	Macro comparison with and without WA adapter Just to give you an idea of how the macro capability compares with and without the wide angle adapter. The cup is held at an angle to show just how shallow D.O.F. is when working with macro (basically in macro mode, shallow depth of field is your enemy). This is rather unscientific; it's intended only to show how different the fields of view are. Apologies for the handheld, unprecise positioning. We'll do this again the right way later on. In both images the focus distance to the blue dots below the "R" is about 20mm. Iris f/1.6, shutter 1/60, gain 0db. Photos recorded to SD card. Compare these with the same images from the XL HD 20x and 6x lenses at http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?p=582131. Attached Thumbnails __________________ CH Search DV Info Net for quick answers \| The best in the business: DV Info Net Sponsors \| ...Tuesday is Soylent Green Day!

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search