Tape Drive mechanism XH-A1 vs. GL-1
 

If anyone has used a Canon GL-1 and also a XH-A1, can you comment on the Tape drive mechanisms. I am very interested in getting the XH-A1, but I am wondering if the tape drive mechanism has been improved over the GL-1. I found that the GL-1 is not very rugged when compared to a Sony PDX10 or PD150. I've read comments which indicated that the XH-A1 was more solidly built than the GL-1 or 2.

Also, my Canon GL-1 heads are much more susceptable to clogging than the Sony heads. (Note, that I always use the exact same tape). Does anyone have feedback on the XH-A1 heads? Thanks.

The tape transport in the XH A1 is about three generations newer than the one from the GL1.

I think the GL2 solved all those early head issues. At least I never heard of any problems with that model, and there were all sorts of problems with the GL1.

I just moved from the GL-1 to the XH A1. No comparison at all. Much better.

Don

Thanks for the Info on Tape Drive Mechanism.
 

Thanks to everyone who replied to my concerns about the Tape Drive Mechanism on the new Canon camcorders!

the GL1 was a much better built camera then the GL2

the A1 is smooth, silent, and stronger.
i was so used to the canon gear grind and kick back..i thought my A1 was f'd up at first.