what make a high def lens a high def lens?
i know that the xlh1 comes with a hi definition lens but what does that mean? is the glass clearer, better quality and such?
if so, why can you use the adaptor and L series lenses from the SLR range, i mean, they must be ver good if they are recording around 12mp per pic. |
Most pro-quality lenses made for SLR cameras are of a higher quality than lenses made for video cameras...they need to be.
|
This is an over-simplification. Using Canon EF-lenses with the XL-EF adapter makes use only of the glass at the very center of the lens. Thus the extension factor of 7.2 when compared to 35mm. As a result, only the very best EF-lenses are up to the task of HD-imaging on the XL-H1 (Canon only recommends EF-primes). This thread has more:
http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthread.php?t=56642 |
Additionally still camera lenses serve a huge population compared to "pro-sumer" HDV cameras, so they produce them in huge numbers and can rationalize the R&D and production costs better... Canon is fairly conservative in this arena and will wait until they're sure of a viable market before mass producing lenses for it... unfortunate (for us) but true.. that's what these forums are all about - hopefully someone from Canon reads them regularly...
|
Tighter manufacturing tolerances, a smaller circle of confusion and better control of chromatic abberation. Photographic lenses aren't as complicated to make since they're generally primes, and when they are zooms they don't have nearly the same zoom ratio as a video zoom lens. A video zoom lens capable of a 20x zoom ratio while keeping chromatic abberation to a minimum requires a ridiculous number of lens elements and precision engineering. The 50-100x zooms you see in a sports broadcasting truck can run over $1-200,000.
|
Quote:
There are two definite differences. (1) The HD lens won't stop down as far as the SD ones because the diffraction limiting stop is at about f/9.3 for the HD sensor and appreciably smaller (aperture - not f number) for the SD sensor. (2) The HD lens can be controlled by the camera for taking still pictures. The SD ones can't. The reasons one can use still photography lenses on the camera are because these, being genrally primes, are pretty sharp. It is a far, far easier thing to design a prime with focal length greater than the back focus distance than a 20:1 zoom with focal lengths at the short end appreciably smaller than the back focus distance. If you do use a still camera or SD lens on the XL-H1 don't stop it down more than f/5.6 - 8. This will result in blur from diffraction. A simple experiment will convince you of this. [Edited to correct f/stop values] |
... just to add a detail to what A.J --whose comments I always highly appreciate-- said: For some reason the brights and darks of the 20x lens image are slightly brighter and darker than those of EF-series lenses as if the there was more constrast.
The other way around, I've not figured out any clear technical reason why XL H1 prevents one from taking still images with the EF-series lenses labelled HD incompatible. Instead of preventing from taking the stills, the camera could just warn about too small apertures --and in the ideal case, one could toggle such a message in the menus. |
thanks for all of your replies.
really interesting info. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 04:50 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network