|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools |
January 15th, 2010, 06:25 PM | |
Major Player
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Australia
Posts: 374
|
Hi Leonard,
I have not found a way to have this effect the clips on the time-line. When I first encountered this problem I wasted so much time on it without success. The only option was to open a new time-line and start editing from scratch. Now I always check my files in the bin after import to ensure the anamorphic column is ticked. |
January 15th, 2010, 09:14 PM | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vientiane (Lao PDR)
Posts: 349
|
Hi Lance,
In general FC, AE etc can not tell if a footage is Anamorphic or not (import to FC any average DV Anamorphic and FC won't tag it as that). Is to you to check this property when importing. Rafael |
January 16th, 2010, 09:02 AM | ||
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vientiane (Lao PDR)
Posts: 349
|
Quote:
You always need to check your Anamorphic stuff in the Browser. Conforming the clips to the sequence setting doesn't works. Cheers, rafael |
|
January 16th, 2010, 11:25 PM | |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,684
|
Thanks to everybody who has piped in so far.
As Rafael and Lance suggested, it works to check the anamorphic property in each .MOV clip after it has been imported in FCP. I don't do a great deal of editing, but I don't remember having to do this as a general rule with other kinds of clips so i'm wondering if this is a Nanoflash specific issue. Anyway here is what I've discovered so far in testing the Nanoflash file from the SDX: 1. After bringing the nanoflash.MOV file into Final Cut Pro you must open the settings on the clip and check " anamorphic" . It won't do that automatically and it must be done on the original clip. 2. The sequence has to be 720x486 NTSC CCIR 601 (40x27) ; the pixel aspect NTSC CCIR 601; and "anamorphic 16x9" must be checked. Any changes in those sequence settings caused the picture to look very soft - ( i.e square pixels or 720x480 etc) 3. You can use the clips in either an IMX sequence or a Pro Res sequence and they both look the same as long as the settings are correct. 4. You can export the original IMX clip from FCP using Quicktime to>Pro Res 422 + "stand alone" file, and then bring that back into FCP as a clip. Then you have a Pro Res clip to work with if you want. 5. All of these seem to look exactly the same. I don't know if you need to export to Pro Res in order to cut in Pro Res as it looks OK just bringing the IMX clip into the Pro Res timeline . Also don't know if there is any reason not to just edit in an IMX timeline, except maybe its not as good for intercutting with other material like graphics or footage from other codecs. I'm not that experienced an editor, but when I looked through other footage on my drives all of the SD material is 720x480, not 486( but most of the SD is not anamorphic either.) What's the difference between working in a 720x480 timeline or a 720x486 timeline? I don't recall the Nanoflash giving me a choice about this. |
January 17th, 2010, 09:43 AM | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vientiane (Lao PDR)
Posts: 349
|
Hi Leonard,
the problems for FC keeping track of the "Anamorphic" is not an NANO issue. You export any anamorphic clip from FC, re-import back, and FC doesn't know that is Anamorphic. I think that you are complicating your workflow a little. Check your footage as Anamorphic, and let FC to conform the sequence to the clips. Also, I don't see the need for transcoding to Prores. I haven't tried IMX, but all the XDCAM flavors works well natively in FC. Normally I edit in a native sequence and when everything is ready to export, I change the codec to Prores, and set "Render all YUV material in High Precision". 720x480 is the DV size (DV, DV50) also the standard MPEG-2 for NTSC DVDs is 720x480. The standard for IMX is 720x486, no options. If you lay 720x486 stuff in a 720x480 sequence, FC will crop properly the extra 6 lines. If you are delivering in DVD, editing in 720x480 would be your best option. Also if you will end up printing to DV or DVCPro50. If you output in Betacam, Digibeta or so, keep 720x486. Cheers, rafael PS: And sorry for my double post. |
January 17th, 2010, 12:57 PM | |
Trustee
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: USA
Posts: 1,684
|
Rafael,
I suspected that I should be working in a standard 720x480 sequence which I imagine will make it easier to use other codecs. Unfortunately when I drag the 720x486 clip into a 720x480 sequence it doesn't just clip off the the extra lines, but the entire image goes soft. Is there a way to make FCP simply cut off the extra lines instead? Lenny |
January 17th, 2010, 10:49 PM | |
Major Player
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vientiane (Lao PDR)
Posts: 349
|
Hi Leonard,
FC is aware of the "6 lines" issue and crop them properly: 4 on top and 2 in the bottom. You need to uncheck "Always scale clip to sequence". Otherwise FC will try to put the 6 lines inside the canvas. Cheers, rafael |
| ||||||
|
Thread Tools | |
|
|