|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 2nd, 2010, 03:48 PM
|
#1 |
|
Trustee
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Vulcan
Posts: 1,564
|
We have to pay for H.264?
Is H.264 a legal minefield for video pros? | Deep Tech - CNET News
^isn't it the same for VC-1? dude... if professional videographers are selling many copies... this means they have to start paying royalties to MPEG-LA too? VC-1 to Microsoft? MPEG-2 to MPEG-2 consortium? are there no free ones? Theora is awful
__________________
bow wow wow |
|
|
March 2nd, 2010, 05:36 PM
|
#2 |
|
Wrangler
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Eagle River, AK
Posts: 4,100
|
You got beat to the punch on this one; another thread was already started today about this same article. Let's keep the discussion under that one roof:
http://www.dvinfo.net/forum/distribu...ideo-pros.html
__________________
Pete Bauer The most beautiful thing we can experience is the mysterious. It is the source of all true art and science. Albert Einstein Trying to solve a DV mystery? You may find the answer behind the SEARCH function ... or be able to join a discussion already in progress! |
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
