DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Distribution Center (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/distribution-center/)
-   -   124 min. Video: DVD-5 or DVD-9? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/distribution-center/116632-124-min-video-dvd-5-dvd-9-a.html)

Bryan Aycock March 9th, 2008 07:08 PM

124 min. Video: DVD-5 or DVD-9?
 
My vid is 124 min. I'd like high quality, yet discmakers says I can fit 130 min. of excellent quality on a standard DVD. Most say 1 1/2 hours tops for DVD-5. Who's right?

Jon Omiatek March 9th, 2008 07:26 PM

IMO - 1.5 hours is the maximum. I've done as much as 120 minutes but the quality is far less than the 90 minutes on the same dvd.

George Wing March 9th, 2008 07:43 PM

Depends on the source -- original recording/format, and video contents -- talking heads (interviews, lectures, etc...) might look good (low action). High-speed action and complicated scenes to compress might not look as good. Also depends on your encoder/encoding method. And ultimately, it will be subjective -- you should compress several sections of your video at the required bitrate to fit 124min, and see if it meets your quality standards...

hint: use AC3 audio (instead of LPCM audio) to give yourself a fighting chance...

Regards,
George

Emre Safak March 9th, 2008 11:32 PM

DVD-5 is enough for two hours, if you use AC3.

Bryan Aycock March 10th, 2008 12:11 AM

Well...
 
So if I want to compare my MPEG2 DVD to my source material, would the best way be to rip it back off the DVD, render it in my timeline, and compare the two there on the same monitor?

George Wing March 10th, 2008 07:50 AM

I would burn it to a DVD and play it back from a dvd player connected to a TV that is roughly the average size of the TV's you expect your target audience to be viewing the DVD (yeah, that's the tought part -- who knows what size TV's they have -- I just play it on the largest TV in my house, and if it looks good from a normal viewing distance, I'm good to go...)

Regards,
George

Ervin Farkas March 10th, 2008 09:17 AM

High quality means different things to different people - you need to test for yourself. If I were you, I'd go with two disks.

It also depends on the encoding software (or hardware)... two hours of video encoded with Cinemacraft might just look better than one hour encoded with Encore.

Martin Pauly March 10th, 2008 11:28 AM

Bryan,
Quote:

Originally Posted by Bryan Aycock (Post 839882)
So if I want to compare my MPEG2 DVD to my source material, would the best way be to rip it back off the DVD, render it in my timeline, and compare the two there on the same monitor?

No, rendering it in your timeline will again modify the quality somewhat. Plus, what do you expect to learn from it? You already know that the MPEG-2 video will look worse than the source material. Instead, you really want to compare the different encodes for DVD-5 and DVD-9.

So I would do two MPEG-2 encode with two different average bitrates: the one you can afford on a DVD-5 and the one you'd have on a DVD-9. Then take representative samples (the same ones from each encode) and put them on a DVD - I'm not quite sure how, I guess mpegstreamclip could help you. Note that just encoding only the representative samples at the same average bitrates would not have the same result, since the encoder would allocate the bitrate differently for just the subset of material.

Then compare the two DVDs on several different TVs with different DVD players. Can you see a difference? If so, does it justify the extra expense for a DVD-9?

- Martin


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:30 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network