Opinions on whether i should return the MBP or not
I just picked up the brand new MBP 17' last week because i was tired of all the render issues i had with my normal 13' macbook....
i used it for a bit and i realised the render issues are STILL there, i gotta wait 1-2 min whenever i drop a new video in and if i change the speed or whatever on the video i gotta re render....i thought this issue would have been dropt when i picked up the new laptop i am now contemplating returning this macbook pro for a mac pro....if im goin to spend 3000$ i rather get a machine that eliminates render times no? |
Go with the Mac Pro. Personally, I'd get a used Mac Pro system on Ebay and use the extra money to buy the parts for a hardware RAID (either RAID 0 or 5). This will allow for speedy rendering, especially when you create a constant speed change.
-C |
Absolutely a MacPro.
Video editing on a laptop, to me seems unrealistic. You will always run into major problems and as time goes on your mbp will feel slower and slower. Future proof with a MacPro. |
Quote:
|
make sure your sequence settings match the captured video. the easiest way to do this is open a new sequence and drop in a clip. FCP asks if it should match the sequence to the clip, you say 'YES'.
i have a MBP with FCP and edit HDV easily... |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I think the MBP vs. MP argument is missing the point here.
A MBP is perfectly capable of playing HD with realtime effects, as long as you're using one of the supported codecs and your timeline is set right. A Mac Pro can do a few more layers or effects in realtime, but the difference is not THAT huge. I've edited 2hr feature films in ProRes 1080p with a significant number of composited layers and effects, color correction on every clip, etc. on a MBP and it was fine. Sure, my realtime playback wasn't always at full quality and I had to wait a little more (especially for final output renders), but it's completely possible. In the OP's case, it seems they are using an unsupported codec for editing, thus the long render times to be able to see anything. You could spend $6000 on a top of the line Mac Pro and then the renders would finish in 5 minutes instead of 10, but you'd still have to re-render and wait EVERY time you made any change to your timeline. A much easier, faster, and cheaper solution would be to convert the files over to a supported codec like AIC or ProRes. Then even a MBP could edit them without much render time at all. |
I would just mention another point as an aside. Have you checked the return/exchange policy with the vendor? If you purchase online from Apple, computers may be exchanged within 14 days for a 10% restocking fee if they have been opened. HOWEVER, there is a very important caveat which some people have learned about too late. If you order a custom-configured Mac, it CANNOT BE RETURNED. A custom configuration might be as simple as adding more RAM. See Apple's policy here: Apple Sales and Refund Policy
|
Going back to what William said earlier, make sure your sequence settings match the codec in which your video is created. This is very likely the cause as to why your have to endure a render even from just importing your source footage. If your source footage is not of a standard video codec to which you can set your sequence settings, there are several options available for you to convert it before dropping into FCP, or you can continue to await the importing render times.
As far as viewing adjustments, you might want to double check your RT settings and ensure you have them set to allow RT previews conducive to the footage, processing, and system specs you are working with. Finally, you also may note that many of the effects listed in your Filters list are presented in bold type, while a select few others are not. The bold type indicates that those filters will allow for real-time previews without having to be rendered. The ones in standard type will have to be rendered before they are previewed. As to this last part, I am not sure if it is directly tied to the VRAM capabilities of your specific system. I just transitioned from a 5 year old Powerbook running FCP 4.5 to a new 24" iMac running FCP 6, and noted the bold type filters. My old system didn't present distinguishing type in the Filters list, and it was severely underpowered in the graphics area....consequently, every filter required rendering in order to preview. -Jon |
Quote:
|
Hey thanks for all the responses!
my question to you guys now is how do i convert the video from my digtal camera into a format that my FCP can use with realtime effects? |
Quote:
Some apps focus specifically on optimizing your conversion to compressed formats, but that is not necessarily what you are looking for here. So since you are using FCP, it is safe to assume that you also have the Pro key for Quicktime. Quicktime Pro can also handle most of your basic conversion/transcoding needs. This may not be the most intuitive application to work with for some folks, so you might also consider MpegStreamclip from Squared 5. Squared 5 - MPEG Streamclip video converter for Mac and Windows This is a very popular utitlity for such purposes. Just be sure to transcode your video into a codec most conducive to your preferred editing format. Mpeg Streamclip lays out the options quite well. -Jon |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:02 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network