|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
May 31st, 2005, 09:01 AM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: baltimore, md
Posts: 51
|
interlace vs. progressive
im working on a project now that is going to be shot on a sony HDV. when i import the footage it looks real nice. but when i save out QT's to take into after effects i of course get the interlace lines real bad in the motion. so if i just export a QT from FCP it has a de-interlace filter (or appears to) but the quality loss is extremely significant. what can i do? is there a setting in the camera that can record as progressive instead or a setting in the capture to avoid this so i dont have to use a filter, that asit appears to me essentially just blurs the frame.
if it helps the final output is to a DVD and will be played on progressive scan monitors. if anyone has any suggestions it would be greatly appreciated.
__________________
Jeremy Martin Uhrwerk.nu |
|
|
|
June 1st, 2005, 05:21 AM
|
#2 |
|
RED Code Chef
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,514
|
Which camera are you using? It may or may not support progressive.
If it doesn't there is not much you can do except a de-interlace in post. A capture can never be done in progressive (if the source is interlaced).
__________________
Rob Lohman, visuar@iname.com DV Info Wrangler & RED Code Chef Join the DV Challenge | Lady X Search DVinfo.net for quick answers | Buy from the best: DVinfo.net sponsors |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
