DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Final Cut Suite (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/final-cut-suite/)
-   -   Dual-Core 3.33GHz vs. Quad-Core 2.8GHz? (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/final-cut-suite/475151-dual-core-3-33ghz-vs-quad-core-2-8ghz.html)

Devin Vaughn March 19th, 2010 01:34 PM

Dual-Core 3.33GHz vs. Quad-Core 2.8GHz?
 
Hello. I'm looking at a new iMac for video editing with FCP.

I'm curious as to the advantage of a quad-core processor, when its speed is not as fast as a dual-core.

Can anyone help me out?

Thanks.

William Hohauser March 19th, 2010 01:53 PM

While it doesn't come out in real performance like this, a dual 3.33 equals 6.66 and a quad 2.8 equals 11.2. No matter what, this quad processor will give you better performance.

Shaun Roemich March 19th, 2010 01:57 PM

Which of course is further complicated by the fact that not all applications can lever the performance advantages of multiple processors but generally speaking, more processors = good.

Graeme Hay March 21st, 2010 08:29 PM

perhaps not all apps, but specifically FCP?

Brian Boyko March 21st, 2010 08:33 PM

I believe that FCP 6 is a single-core application, which means that if you are using FCP and have no plans to upgrade, go with the 3.33GHz dual-core. If you're using FCP 7, which I believe is multi-core, go with the quad-core.

William Hohauser March 21st, 2010 09:16 PM

FCP will recognize a quad-core chip and utilize all cores during renders. FCP can not recognize two multiple core processors, such as in 8-core MacPros, but Compressor can when the system is set up correctly.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:50 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network