How can a WMV look good? at DVinfo.net
DV Info Net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Cross-Platform Post Production Solutions > Distribution Center > Flash / Web Video
Register FAQ Today's Posts Buyer's Guides

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 23rd, 2006, 04:03 PM   #1
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 52
How can a WMV look good?

Is there any way to make a WMV look good?


We need to deliver it on the web at 320x240.
Michael Dominic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2006, 04:19 PM   #2
Jubal 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 872
What's "good"? I don't get the question. WMVs look fine.
David Jimerson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2006, 04:44 PM   #3
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 52
Quote:
Originally Posted by David Jimerson
What's "good"? I don't get the question. WMVs look fine.
No, honestly they look like crap most of the time. Blocky and compressed, next to a QuickTime file of the same size.
Michael Dominic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2006, 04:51 PM   #4
Jubal 28
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Wilmington, NC
Posts: 872
Actually, I find the exact opposite to be true -- WMVs rock QT for filesize to quality. QTs got a lot better with H.264, but they're still not quite the same.

You're at a particular advantage when you're coding it to be 320x240, because you pack in quality at a low filesize, and they blow up to 200% (full size) very nicely.

In general, set your bitrate for 500K or more, the quality to about 80-82% and your "seconds per keyframe" to 3, and you'll get good results. If the filesize comes out smaller than you'd accept, up the quality.

What have you tried? And what software are you using?
David Jimerson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2006, 05:04 PM   #5
Trustee
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad CA
Posts: 1,132
david is right, if you can't make wmv look better than quicktime, you are doing something wrong.

it sounds like you are trying to encode wmv with a mac?? that is not a good combo at all, try downloading the free windows media encoder for the pc, and set it up to use two-pass encoding with the wmv 9 format.

if you are doing talking heads, you can try cutting the framerate in half during the encoding process... do not cut the frame rate during the edit itself... encoding web video at a low frame rate frees up a lot of bandwidth that will be added to the existing frames.
Dan Euritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2006, 05:24 PM   #6
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 52
Yeah, I'm on a mac...

Where can I get the PC encoder? I'm on a PC at the office.

Thanks!


Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Euritt
david is right, if you can't make wmv look better than quicktime, you are doing something wrong.

it sounds like you are trying to encode wmv with a mac?? that is not a good combo at all, try downloading the free windows media encoder for the pc, and set it up to use two-pass encoding with the wmv 9 format.

if you are doing talking heads, you can try cutting the framerate in half during the encoding process... do not cut the frame rate during the edit itself... encoding web video at a low frame rate frees up a lot of bandwidth that will be added to the existing frames.
Michael Dominic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 23rd, 2006, 10:28 PM   #7
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NYC, NY
Posts: 52
I'm on a mac... Every WMV that I've seen looks choppy. QT looks very smooth in comparison.

I use cleaner 6, but I'm going to try to encode on a PC tomorrow. It has to be compatible with PC and Mac as well.

Thanks.


Quote:
Originally Posted by David Jimerson
Actually, I find the exact opposite to be true -- WMVs rock QT for filesize to quality. QTs got a lot better with H.264, but they're still not quite the same.

You're at a particular advantage when you're coding it to be 320x240, because you pack in quality at a low filesize, and they blow up to 200% (full size) very nicely.

In general, set your bitrate for 500K or more, the quality to about 80-82% and your "seconds per keyframe" to 3, and you'll get good results. If the filesize comes out smaller than you'd accept, up the quality.

What have you tried? And what software are you using?
Michael Dominic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 24th, 2006, 12:57 PM   #8
Trustee
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Carlsbad CA
Posts: 1,132
cleaner 6 should do a good job if it has the wmv 9 codec, because it'll have 2-pass encoding capability... have you looked at the wmv presets in cleaner? it could be that the bitrate vs. framesize vs. framerate you have been encoding at is not right.

you can download the free windows media encoder for the pc from the microsoft website, but i can't remember the exact url.
Dan Euritt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 10th, 2006, 08:50 PM   #9
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Aus
Posts: 3,884
Another thing that might be a problem si your colour space..

try running a colour correction from Studio RGB to Computer RGB. this SHOULD fix any gamma nuances u may find
Peter Jefferson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 11th, 2006, 06:34 AM   #10
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: US
Posts: 1,152
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dan Euritt
you can download the free windows media encoder for the pc from the microsoft website, but i can't remember the exact url.
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/win...r/default.mspx

You want "Windows Media Encoder 9 Series."
Christopher Lefchik is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY USA

Scan Computers Int. Ltd.
+44 0871-472-4747
Bolton, Lancashire UK


DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Cross-Platform Post Production Solutions > Distribution Center > Flash / Web Video


 



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:23 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network