|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 30th, 2009, 08:51 AM
|
#1 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Key West
Posts: 247
|
Mac Pro Quad core vs: 8 core
I own a Mac 8 core and use it with FCP 6+ to edit footage from and EX1 as well as AVCHD footage from a Canon. All works great...no complaints. Our office needs to get a second mac for work load reasons. Money is tight. Will a Quad core do the job? Does anyone have any experiences with both to offer comparisons in speed with FCP and HD ?
Thanks, Craig |
|
|
|
April 30th, 2009, 09:17 AM
|
#2 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Cambridge UK
Posts: 2,853
|
Mac Pro Early 2009 (4 versus 8 core)
Reports I've read suggest Quad is certainly a capable machine. I'm buying an 8 core (2.66, as this seems the best price performance sweet spot for my needs, but have not got it yet). I take it you've seen the comparisons on sites such as these? Well worth reading before you spend the dosh!
4-core versus 8-core Nehalem Mac Pro Pro Apps on Nehalem Mac Pro - Cores? Memory? And follow this thread too (Post 36 is well worth reading re your question)... 2.66 Quad vs 2.93 Quad Buyer's Guide (Includes Octos) - Mac Forums Hope this helps!
__________________
Andy K Wilkinson - https://www.shootingimage.co.uk Cambridge (UK) Corporate Video Production |
|
|
|
|
April 30th, 2009, 10:21 AM
|
#3 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Key West
Posts: 247
|
Thnaks Andy
I will check out those links...I was not aware of them.
I agree that the 8 core bang for the buck is really terrific. We have had ours for just over a year and have been very pleased. Thanks again for the feedback. Best, Craig Key West, Florida Keys, Key West attractions, Florida Keys hotels, Key West Information - Key West Travel Guide and attractions, videos online |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
|
