Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Cross-Platform Post Production Solutions > High Definition Video Editing Solutions

High Definition Video Editing Solutions
For all HD formats including HDV, HDCAM, DVCPRO HD and others.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old August 24th, 2011, 07:26 PM   #1
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sulligent, Alabama
Posts: 132
Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

I currently help edit for a nationally broadcast show. We shoot HDV in 1080/60i and import HDV files into FCP 7. We edit in the same format & export a .mov file. We then pull that file into Adobe Media Encoder and output a MPEG2 file for network submission for SD broadcast.

My first priority is Quality for broadcast - best it can be in SD of course.

What we have now is working ok - but I'm always looking to improve.

Suggestions / Ideas for improved workflow ?

Thanks
D

HDV in......

MPEG2 out : [ these settings are already saved in Adobe Encoder ]

Format: MPEG 2 video
Format profile: MP@ML
Format settings: BVOP: Yes
Format settings: GOP M=3, N=15
Bit rate mode: constant
Bit rate: 8000 Kbps
Width: 720 Height: 480
Display aspect ratio: 4:3
Frame rate: 29.970 fps
Chroma subsampling: 4:2:0
Standard: NTSC
Scan type: Interlaced
Scan order: top field first

Audio:
Format: MPEG audio
Format version: Version 1
Format profile: Layer II
Bit rate mode: constant
Bit rate: 224 Kbps
Channels: 2
Sampling rate: 48.0 KHz
Sample size: 16 bits
Darin Clifton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 24th, 2011, 11:09 PM   #2
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 1,385
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

Is there a reason you don't export MPEG2 directly from FCP?
__________________
Get the Free Comprehensive Guide to Rigging ANY Camera - one guide to rig them all - DSLRs to the Arri Alexa.
Sareesh Sudhakaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25th, 2011, 12:53 PM   #3
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 260
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

Final Cut doesn't transcode as efficiently as Media Encoder or Compressor. FCP 7 is still 32-bit architecture and so doesn't take advantage of additional RAM. Also, FCP doesn't recognize multiple or multi-core processors. It's slow at transcoding and gives you lower quality video than the other two.
__________________
Reel Impressions Media - Make it more than a memory
GY-HD100- 7D- PSC Promix 3- Lectro/Sennheiser- Zoom H4- MPB- CS6/CC
Christopher Glavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25th, 2011, 08:10 PM   #4
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sulligent, Alabama
Posts: 132
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

Encoder does move along quite fast. That's the reason I was given myself to use it instead of the others.

I'm looking for better workflow back up the line from there. For instance: I've been told that there's an advantage in quality in exporting the mov file from a 720p timeline vs a 1080 timeline. I've tried exporting from 720,1080 and tried both in mov current settings & Pro Res 422 HQ. Here's a screen shot of all 4.
Attached Thumbnails
Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast-mpg-screen-shot.png  
Darin Clifton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 25th, 2011, 10:56 PM   #5
Trustee
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mumbai, India
Posts: 1,385
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

The only way I see this going faster is if, instead of a mov file in the intermediary step, you export/render to an image sequence. This will speed up your second transcode to MPEG2. The other upside is if your system crashes during the first render, you can start from where it crashed, rather than from the beginning with mov.

The downsides are you'll need more hard disk space, and you'll need to layer in audio separately again.

The fastest workflow in your case is to shift to Adobe Premiere. You can edit HDV natively (without the MOV wrapper). You can export directly to MPEG-2. You can stick to the 1080 60i timeline.
__________________
Get the Free Comprehensive Guide to Rigging ANY Camera - one guide to rig them all - DSLRs to the Arri Alexa.
Sareesh Sudhakaran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 26th, 2011, 04:38 AM   #6
Major Player
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Redding, CA
Posts: 260
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

Well he's not looking for a faster workflow but a better (higher quality) workflow...
__________________
Reel Impressions Media - Make it more than a memory
GY-HD100- 7D- PSC Promix 3- Lectro/Sennheiser- Zoom H4- MPB- CS6/CC
Christopher Glavan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30th, 2011, 02:40 PM   #7
Trustee
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

Sareesh hit the nail on the head (as usual).

It looks like the conversion to ProRes either adjusts the gamma or clips the video from 0-255 to 16-235.

The best quality workflow is to export to uncompressed from FCP and use AME to encode from that.

Btw, exporting to NTSC MOV is much lower quality than using MPEG2 CBR. I tested this a while back before uploading some 30s spots.
Steve Kalle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30th, 2011, 06:23 PM   #8
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Sulligent, Alabama
Posts: 132
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

Steve -

The final out product from AME is MPEG2 / CBR.

If I should export as uncompressed - Should I export from FCP as 8 bit or 10 bit uncompressed NTSC ?

Then , I assume process that thru AME for the required final .

Thanks !
Darin Clifton is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 30th, 2011, 10:54 PM   #9
Trustee
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 1,554
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

Hi Darin,

8 bit uncompressed is fine. Also, for best results, make sure you have MRQ checked in AME (Max Render Quality). It will add significant time to the encoding but makes a noticeable difference, especially when down-scaling. Probably the best method would be to export as HD from FCP and use AME to down-scale. With MRQ enabled on a CUDA enabled machine, AME uses the same Bicubic Sharper algorithm as Photoshop which is very very good.
Steve Kalle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old September 1st, 2011, 06:29 PM   #10
Inner Circle
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Brisbane, Australia
Posts: 2,257
Re: Workflow ideas for Better Broadcast

Better still, why not bypass the mpeg2 standard and go directly to h264 encoding instead? If the station will accept this then it's a no-brainer.

Whether they are digital or analogue broadcasting, chances are that your programme will benefit. Even for digital broadcasting, I'd expect that your mpeg2 file will be re-encoded for DTV transport stream output (which isn't a regular mpeg2 stream).

Andrew
Andrew Smith is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Z.G.C.
(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Cross-Platform Post Production Solutions > High Definition Video Editing Solutions

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



Google
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 12:47 AM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2017 The Digital Video Information Network