Jvc Gy-dv700yucl at DVinfo.net

Hugh DiMauro · June 20th, 2003, 11:14 AM

Has anybody heard anything positive/negative about the JVC Cineline camcorders? They use mini DV tapes and are supposed to give "cine" like pictures. They cost around $9,000.00 without the lens and they seem like the poor man's answer to Panasonic's and Sony's 24p models. Any first hand knowledge would be appreciated.

Glenn Gipson · June 20th, 2003, 12:36 PM

I would like to know the answer to your question also. I tried to rent one once, and couldn’t find it anywhere. I don’t think these camera’s ever took off. JVC seems to be very bad at pushing their products. BUT, given that there are new low cost progressive options out now, I really don’t have an interest in these cameras anymore. I am, however, curious as to why these cameras never took off.

Heath McKnight · June 20th, 2003, 01:40 PM

<<<-- Originally posted by Hugh DiMauro : Has anybody heard anything positive/negative about the JVC Cineline camcorders? They use mini DV tapes and are supposed to give "cine" like pictures. They cost around $9,000.00 without the lens and they seem like the poor man's answer to Panasonic's and Sony's 24p models. Any first hand knowledge would be appreciated. -->>>

I almost bought one two years ago, but didn't. They don't do 24P, as far as I know, neither the D9 nor the minidv. But they shoot native 16:9. They haven't talked about those cameras since they came out and advertised everywhere with the guy in dreads and the older dude with a goatee. It was EVERYWHERE...

heath

Hugh DiMauro · June 23rd, 2003, 02:54 PM

Thanks for your replies.

Frank Granovski · June 23rd, 2003, 03:32 PM

One guy bought one a year or two back. I know the guy from dv.com. He's since sold it and moved on to something else. I recall him being all hyped up about it before he bought, then he stopped posting until recently, inquiring about another cam. I think it was with the DVX100.

Heath McKnight · June 23rd, 2003, 03:38 PM

<<<-- Originally posted by Frank Granovski : One guy bought one a year or two back. I know the guy from dv.com. He's since sold it and moved on to something else. I recall him being all hyped up about it before he bought, then he stopped posting until recently, inquiring about another cam. I think it was with the DVX100. -->>>

Glad I didn't buy one two years ago. Hope this doesn't make me regret buying the HD. then again, the HD10 costs 12 grand less than the 700.

heath

June 20th, 2003, 11:14 AM	#1
Hugh DiMauro Trustee Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Central Florida Posts: 1,205	Jvc Gy-dv700yucl Has anybody heard anything positive/negative about the JVC Cineline camcorders? They use mini DV tapes and are supposed to give "cine" like pictures. They cost around $9,000.00 without the lens and they seem like the poor man's answer to Panasonic's and Sony's 24p models. Any first hand knowledge would be appreciated.

June 20th, 2003, 01:40 PM	#3
Heath McKnight MPS Digital Studios Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Palm Beach County, Florida Posts: 8,531	Re: Jvc Gy-dv700yucl <<<-- Originally posted by Hugh DiMauro : Has anybody heard anything positive/negative about the JVC Cineline camcorders? They use mini DV tapes and are supposed to give "cine" like pictures. They cost around $9,000.00 without the lens and they seem like the poor man's answer to Panasonic's and Sony's 24p models. Any first hand knowledge would be appreciated. -->>> I almost bought one two years ago, but didn't. They don't do 24P, as far as I know, neither the D9 nor the minidv. But they shoot native 16:9. They haven't talked about those cameras since they came out and advertised everywhere with the guy in dreads and the older dude with a goatee. It was EVERYWHERE... heath __________________ My Final Cut Pro X blog

June 23rd, 2003, 03:38 PM	#6
Heath McKnight MPS Digital Studios Join Date: Apr 2003 Location: Palm Beach County, Florida Posts: 8,531	<<<-- Originally posted by Frank Granovski : One guy bought one a year or two back. I know the guy from dv.com. He's since sold it and moved on to something else. I recall him being all hyped up about it before he bought, then he stopped posting until recently, inquiring about another cam. I think it was with the DVX100. -->>> Glad I didn't buy one two years ago. Hope this doesn't make me regret buying the HD. then again, the HD10 costs 12 grand less than the 700. heath __________________ My Final Cut Pro X blog

June 20th, 2003, 12:36 PM	#2
Glenn Gipson Major Player Join Date: Jan 2003 Location: Plainfield, New Jersey Posts: 927	I would like to know the answer to your question also. I tried to rent one once, and couldn’t find it anywhere. I don’t think these camera’s ever took off. JVC seems to be very bad at pushing their products. BUT, given that there are new low cost progressive options out now, I really don’t have an interest in these cameras anymore. I am, however, curious as to why these cameras never took off.

June 23rd, 2003, 02:54 PM	#4
Hugh DiMauro Trustee Join Date: Jun 2003 Location: Central Florida Posts: 1,205	Thanks for your replies.

June 23rd, 2003, 03:32 PM	#5
Frank Granovski Outer Circle Join Date: May 2002 Location: Hope, BC Posts: 7,524	One guy bought one a year or two back. I know the guy from dv.com. He's since sold it and moved on to something else. I recall him being all hyped up about it before he bought, then he stopped posting until recently, inquiring about another cam. I think it was with the DVX100.