DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Open DV Discussion (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/open-dv-discussion/)
-   -   Best 3 CCD or 3 CMOS under $1000... (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/open-dv-discussion/100002-best-3-ccd-3-cmos-under-1000-a.html)

Alfred Diaz July 28th, 2007 09:12 PM

Best 3 CCD or 3 CMOS under $1000...
 
What is your suggestion on the best new 3 CCD or 3 CMOS camera with mic input ability and headphone jack.

Price should be bases on new, and it should be a model that can be found now. (The Panason PV-GS 200 and PV-GS 250 meet this criteria, but you can't buy them new anymore).

This is for a nonprofit community looking to start an after-school video training program for at-risk teens. Please stay under a grand, but if it's slighly over, send it to me as well.

Thank you all.

One more thing. Would prefer minidv, but at this point am willing to consider DVD cameras.

Jon McGuffin July 28th, 2007 10:08 PM

I'm not aware of any 3 CCD camera under 1K that can really do this...

David Stoneburner July 29th, 2007 09:15 AM

Since it is a training program, I would say that you could use a single CCD camera. Yes, 3 CCDs are better, but under good lighting conditions and with some smart shooting, 1 CCD will works nicely. I work at a university, and we have single CCD cameras for general check out and some of the students make very nice looking video. I usually start at B&H when looking for cameras and prices. After a quick search, for under 1k, your choices are very limited. You have to sacrifice something. Either the 3 CCDs, mic input or headphone input. It's quite a shame that all three are not being offered in consumer cameras anymore. The Canon HV20 is just under your price and has mic inputs and heaphone jacks, but it is a single CMOS. The Sony HC7 is a couple hundred dollars over, but still is a single CMOS. There are some 3 CCD Panasonic but they don't have headphone jacks. Since they are around 6-700, you could invest in an external audio mixer and good mic, then use the mixer to feed into the camera and use it for monitoring. Either that or maybe look at some higher end used cameras. Just some ideas. Good luck.

Chris Hurd July 29th, 2007 09:40 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by David Stoneburner (Post 720247)
I would say that you could use a single CCD camera. Yes, 3 CCDs are better, but under good lighting conditions and with some smart shooting, 1 CCD will works nicely...

There are two kinds of single CCD camcorders... those with primary (RGB) color filters and those with complimentary (CMY) color filters. In the $1,000 price range, any single-chip RGB camcorder will match any 3CCD camcorder of equal price because they build color information the same way, with primary color values. The original poster should not concern himself so much with finding a 3CCD camcorder at that price but should consider instead a 1CCD camcorder with an RGB color filter. That would include the single-CMOS Sony and Canon HDV camcorders mentioned above.

David Stoneburner July 29th, 2007 06:57 PM

I agree. The biggest problem is try finding a sub 1k camera that has mic input and headphone jacks. Forget about a manual focus ring. We just got some new cameras for checkout. The originals that were looked at had mic inputs. They sent us the newest models and they didn't come with mic inputs. Panny dropped that option. Kinda sucks.

Alfred Diaz July 30th, 2007 11:16 AM

Great information on Primary vs Complimentary regarding color chip. Is this info normally given in the specs? I didn't see it, or I wasn't looking for the right thing.

I do like canon cameras, and the HV20 is in the price range. So I will give that one a close look.

But here is another possibility brought up in another post. I can monitor my sound with another source. We will be using a shotgun mic and boom pole. So if I find another way to monitor the sound, then I don't need a camera with a headphone, and that opens up a lot of possibilities, one of them being the Panasonic PV-GS500 which we can buy at B&H for under $700.

Ian G. Thompson July 30th, 2007 11:33 AM

Alfred, trust me when I say you will find the picture of the HV20 to be 4 times better than the GS500. I previously owned the 500 and now own the HV20. And I'm not necessarily talking about the HD resolution but even with it scaled down to SD resolution it is much much better. Grant it, I consider the (edit:GS500) to be the absolute best in "consumer" SD cams.

I use a multitrack recorder for audio. This way I can record all sorts of ambient sounds along with my video. Syncing in post is not a real big deal. It's just at the start of every take I make references to the scene which helps later in matching it up on the timeline.

Chris Hurd July 30th, 2007 11:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alfred Diaz (Post 720684)
Great information on Primary vs Complimentary regarding color chip. Is this info normally given in the specs?

If it has a primary color filter, it's often stated so in the marketing material as "RGB color." If it has a complimentary color filter, usually no mention is ever made of it. Most inexpensive single-chip SD camcorders (sub $500) have complimentary color filters. When they do have primary color, it'll be a more expensive camcorder and it will usually say "RGB" somewhere. All of the current single-chip HDV camcorders are RGB.

Chris Barcellos July 30th, 2007 12:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alfred Diaz (Post 720684)
But here is another possibility brought up in another post. I can monitor my sound with another source. We will be using a shotgun mic and boom pole. So if I find another way to monitor the sound, then I don't need a camera with a headphone, and that opens up a lot of possibilities, one of them being the Panasonic PV-GS500 which we can buy at B&H for under $700.

I had a GS120, I passed on to a family member after I got my HV20. Image was so superior.

With HV20, Sound monitoring can be an issue. Basically the AV jack can be set to headphones, or AV out. If I am using an external monitor, that eliminates headphones off the camera, but my external monitor does have sound input too, that I can in turn monitor on phones..... Of course if you monitor off the component output or HDMI, then it is not an issue.

David Stoneburner July 30th, 2007 02:19 PM

I think I would look at the HV20 as well, but I'm sure the GS500 will work too. For monitoring, you might want to look at the Beachtek line of mixers. They offer xlr input that is adapted to mini-pin for your camera. They have a couple different versions. At work I have the lowest end version to complement a GL-1 that is hardly used anymore. It works fine, but if I had a chance to buy again, I would look more closely at their higher end model that has meters on it. Although they are not the best meters, there is something I like about having a visual representation of my sound as well as what I here on the headphones. Let use know which way you decided to go.

Alfred Diaz July 30th, 2007 05:11 PM

All right. After reading the specs, various reviews online, and what you guyts wrote, I am leaning toward the Canon HV20. The only problem is we may be short on our budget. If I can pencil it out, I will go with the Canon. It has the Mic input, headphones, and works well with Premiere Pro. And as an added bonus it will do HD and SD.

But the budget is tight. So...

I am willing to entertain other options, but a grand really is the max. There is still a lot of audio equipment we have to buy.

Thanks for the guidance. More guidance is welcomed.

FYI: Under my supervision, the kids will be writing, shooting and editing a 30 second spot that will air on our local cable stations. So I do need high quality video and audio, or the cable company will reject the spots.

Jon McGuffin July 30th, 2007 10:10 PM

Check first with the cable company to make sure they'll accept your footage. This seems a prudent first step. Also, check out the forums here in the HV20 area and look at some of the sample footage people have posted. I'm certain the quality is up to par..

Good luck...

George Ellis July 31st, 2007 05:23 AM

The Sony HDR-HC7 is also in the $1k range with Mic in and Headphone jack.

Ervin Farkas July 31st, 2007 05:56 AM

Canon & Sony
 
Without a doubt, the best investment in a $1000 (give or take) camcorder at this moment in time is one of these four cameras: Canon HV10/HV20 or the Sony HC5/HC7. See this chart for an incomplete comparison: http://www.camcorderinfo.com/content...s-Compared.htm (prices have dropped since that comparison). Just Google for either model name and tons of other links will come up, there is a lot of useful info (together with some rubbish) on the internet.

To me the Canons are a tad on the fragile side, something you may want to think about, considering that you will give the camera to teenagers not particularly famous about being responsible. The Sonys have a more "secure" feel in the hand compared to the almost all plastic Canons, and unless I'm mistaking, the Canons don't have the LANC controller option should you need it.

Almost all of the electronics stores have these cameras and most would be more than happy to assist you in shooting some footage on a tape you supply; so give them a try and decide.

Good luck,

Alfred Diaz August 12th, 2007 10:26 PM

I think I have picked a camera. After all of your good input and doing lots of online research, and heading down to the local electronics superstore to check out the models, I am going to buy the Canon HV10 or HV20. If we have the extra cash in the budget, we will get the HV20. If we don't, we will get the HV10, which B&H sells for just under $700.

Great stuff on CMOS vs CCD. It steered me in the right direction. And at $700, it sounds like just the right camera for us.

Thanks guys.

Paul V Doherty August 13th, 2007 06:23 AM

Alfred,

Get the HV20!!!!!!
It's worth it for the 24p alone.
I don't understand people's fixation with 3CCD or 3CMOS....
I also own an XL2, arguably the best 1/3" 3CCD SD camera ever made, and let me tell you the single chip HV20 blows it away.

Steve House August 13th, 2007 07:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Alfred Diaz (Post 720684)
...
But here is another possibility brought up in another post. I can monitor my sound with another source. We will be using a shotgun mic and boom pole. So if I find another way to monitor the sound, then I don't need a camera with a headphone, and that opens up a lot of possibilities, one of them being the Panasonic PV-GS500 which we can buy at B&H for under $700.

Not true, you still need to be able to monitor the sound reaching the camera. Consider the situation where you're boom operator is monitoring the sound at the microphone, perhaps with a little headphone amp clipped to his belt, but there's a loose connection where the cable goes into the camera. Monitoring through a headphone jack on the camera will tell you something's not working while monitoring only at the mic end of the cable you won't find out until it's too late to reshoot it. If this is a training program you need to teach your students the right way to go about it.

Marc Israel October 26th, 2007 10:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Paul V Doherty (Post 728057)
Alfred,

Get the HV20!!!!!!
It's worth it for the 24p alone.
I don't understand people's fixation with 3CCD or 3CMOS....
I also own an XL2, arguably the best 1/3" 3CCD SD camera ever made, and let me tell you the single chip HV20 blows it away.

Can you use the HV20 without HD - just regular SD? And how is the quality with that? Can you shoot 24p without HD? And how is the Cinema Mode?
Thanks...

Chris Barcellos October 26th, 2007 11:33 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Marc Israel (Post 765250)
Can you use the HV20 without HD - just regular SD? And how is the quality with that? Can you shoot 24p without HD? And how is the Cinema Mode?
Thanks...

1. Yes.

2. Quality: good.

3. 24p without HD, no.

4. Cine mode gives you a flatter color, wider latitude, less contrasty image, that lends itself to better color grading in post.

Marc Israel October 26th, 2007 11:36 AM

chris,
thanks much for that! much obliged.
marc


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:09 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network