HDV Compression Artifacts - Fact and Fiction at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Open DV Discussion

Open DV Discussion
For topics which don't fit into any of the other categories.

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old October 14th, 2007, 11:10 AM   #1
Major Player
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Hillsborough, NC, USA
Posts: 968
HDV Compression Artifacts - Fact and Fiction


Recently, there have been a number of threads asking about whether SD has any life left in it and how HDV can produce superior SD. However, there have been many claims that the MPEG2 nature of HDV makes it unsuitable for editing esp. compared to non-interframe compression schemes.

Now that HDV camcorders have been around for sometime, I'm very curious to know the following from HDV practitioners (not other HD formats):

1. When editing HDV for final HDV output, do you experience any interframe compression artifacts, especially at non I-frame edit points?

2. When down converting to SD DV, do you see any motion artifacts?

3. If you import down-converted SD DV into your NLE for inclusion with other traditional SD material, can you see motion artifacts?

I'm not interested in the subjective benefits of HDV over SD, just the real-world experiences with the technical differences relating to compression artifacts.



Last edited by John Miller; October 14th, 2007 at 06:10 PM. Reason: Typo
John Miller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14th, 2007, 11:40 AM   #2
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Canada
Posts: 547
I did some tests on HDV-> SD and HDV vs. DV years ago when the FX1 came out. The only real ways to break HDV are:

- whip pans with very high shutter speeds
- strobe lights
- extremely detailed scenes.

In every case, when viewed in HD the artefacts were quite noticeable, but when down-converted to SD were almost indistinguishable from DV compression artefacts.

My overall conclusion was that no matter how badly you shoot HDV, you can never make the overall image quality worse than DV... and if you shoot well, HDV is always superior.

Steven White is offline   Reply With Quote
Old October 14th, 2007, 03:25 PM   #3
Major Player
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 487
I fully agree with Steven.

Originally Posted by Steven White View Post
- strobe lights
I did a commercial about 6 months ago, and we flickered the room's lights on and off repeatedly (I know, not good for the light bulbs) to make the room look like there was a party going on. When I went to edit, I was in for a big surprise...
It was for SD broadcast anyway though, so it didn't really look that bad.
I love HDV!
Chris Harris is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

Omega Broadcast
(512) 251-7778
Austin, TX

(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

(800) 238-8480
Glendale, CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > The Tools of DV and HD Production > Open DV Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 10:10 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2015 The Digital Video Information Network