|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
March 18th, 2004, 06:08 PM
|
#16 |
|
Retired DV Info Net Almunus
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Austin, TX USA
Posts: 2,882
|
Richard, didn't miss it. Just disagree.
The director, whether he wears one hat or three or many, greatly determines the final product. Same as a conductor. Have you ever played in an orchestra? You'd be surprised how one individual, the conductor, can affect the performances of so many. |
|
|
|
March 18th, 2004, 07:17 PM
|
#17 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Barcelona
Posts: 312
|
I see it this way...
Movie making is not a Democracy, it can be more or less democratic, but at the end, "USUALLY" if something is wrong on a movie itīs going to be the Directors fault. If something is not good, No one is going to blame the First Assistant Director.. or the Gaffer... (maybe the producer)... So if the director carries the final responsability, I think he/she can put "A film by" if wanted. Allthough some times it does sound a bit out of place. ACtually it could be considered an act of courage... (ot stupidity, considering some movies out there).
__________________
Messenger Boy : The Thessalonian you're fighting, he's the biggest man I've ever seen. I wouldn't want to fight him. Achilles : That is why no one will remember your name. |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
