|
|||||||||
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
August 27th, 2009, 11:14 AM | #16 | |
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 140
|
Quote:
Next you'll be concerned about the pulldown: ignore the "footage interpretation" pulldown gizmos, since none of the defaults apply. Best case, there is a pattern to the field/frame repeats resulting from the above settings that you can use. e.g. By rendering at yet another frame rate, only taking every so-many frames; or by making nested comps with particular frame rates. Jigsawing the multiples back together would be another interesting trick, more difficult if there's not a simple pattern to the way the 16 fps was upsampled. The benefit would come if there are actually several separate scans of each of the original frames-- as opposed to truly identical data repeated 2 or 3 times-- then you'd have a tiny bit more data from each image you could use to reconstruct the original. I suppose there might be some noise in the VHS/DVD data that could be smoothed out by overlaying (or otherwise combining) those multiplied frames, even if the raw frame-scans were identical originally. |
|
August 27th, 2009, 12:31 PM | #17 |
Trustee
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: North Conway, NH
Posts: 1,745
|
Andrew... That's definitely worth a shot. I'll try that.
|
| ||||||
|
|