Pal to NTSC is it a big quailty drop to convert
I hate to admit it but I have never had to shoot in PAL, however, since some of the new cams that I am interested in (ie. Sony's HVR-Z1/HVR-M10U FX1, etc.) will only give me progressive in 25p not 24, I am kinda interested in knowing what type of headache it will be to convert from Pal to NTSC (and what % of resolution I can expect to lose). I hate this indirect method but se la vie.
Thanks |
The resolution of the "PAL" and "NTSC" versions of the camera are the same, but the "PAL" version might be less compressed. However, the camera's progressive modes look bad and are low rez compared to what a decent smart-de-interlacer can do in post.
Graeme |
Got it. So I'll wait until NAB (or get an xl2 and still wait until NAB)
|
I would seriously test this conversion out before going down this
road (ie, buying a camera!). The resolution is the least of your troubles since PAL is higher (720 x 576 instead of 720 x 480). The problem comes with framerates. If you want to stay true to NTSC you will have to convert to 30p which will probably introduce jitters into your motion etc. If you want to go down to 24p it is easiest to interprete the footage as 24p and then slow the audio down by 4% to match the new length. This is what Europe does all the time to confirm 25p footage to 24p. |
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:45 AM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network