DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Open DV Discussion (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/open-dv-discussion/)
-   -   Stupid YouTube Question (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/open-dv-discussion/85929-stupid-youtube-question.html)

Jason Leonard February 7th, 2007 06:34 PM

Stupid YouTube Question
 
drumroll please.......
i am in the process of taking my first venture into the glorious world of youtube...and problems are abound!
i've been trying to post my measly 4 minute video but everytime i upload and view it the final product is GARBAGE!
it looks like web video circa 1995 (i.e. blocky, terrible and full of teenage angst).
No matter what settings i've tried i get the exact same results.
currently i'm using premier 6.5 (yeah thats right, it still exists) and it's built in compressors.
i've scoured the youtube website and all that i can find is that they perfer the video to be under 10 minutes and 100 MB.
At premiere's seemingly lowest compression i am ending up with a file that is around 70MB.
Heres another problem, the 70MB compressed file looks fine (well, acceptable) on my system but when youtube recompress its total shite!
come on all you you-tubers, help a brother out here and let me know your secrets!

thanks in advance
Jay

Bob Hart February 7th, 2007 06:53 PM

You could try a DivX file. The divX encoder (the function is standalone and called "Converter", is downloadable as a trial. I thought it was free but only the player is. That seems to yield the best reuslts from an exported .avi file.

Mark Williams February 7th, 2007 07:40 PM

Jason,

You may want to read this thread...

http://www.dvinfo.net/conf/showthrea...hlight=youtube

Dylan Pank February 8th, 2007 05:15 AM

Jason - what codec are you using? If you provide a link the we might be able to diagnose the problem. Youtube does resize and recompress your file, (then stretches it on the webpage to make it look bigger) but it should look better than 1990s web video.

My wife has some films up on youtube: This one was encoded as a XviD file and looks pretty good: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ttZxONzWOlU

Obviously there are artefacts, but youtube crushes the file down to FLV, 320*240, 300k/s, and makes the sound mono, 22050 hzand 54k/s, so it does a pretty good job considering all that.

Wade Spencer February 8th, 2007 11:32 AM

Hi.

I just posted up to YouTube for the first time on Sunday with these two clips:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DN8mWiRotIo

and

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AFk7p102hTQ

I exported a full quality AVI file out of Premiere Pro 2.0, and used MPEGStreamClip software (free) to encode to MPEG4 using H.264, 320x240, and I experimented with various quality settings to get it just under a 100 mbs It looks compressed, but not terrible in my opinion. Much better than some I've seen.

Good luck!

Jonathan Bufkin February 8th, 2007 11:57 AM

Is there a reason that you want to use youtube? Just checking because there was a time that I thought that was the best iption for posting web video fro free but that is just not the case. One option is to post it on http://www.archive.org/index.php . It's free and you get to decide the codec. There are other options as well. Just trying to be helpful.

Jon Bufkin
http://www.jonbufkin.com

Jason Leonard February 9th, 2007 05:05 PM

thanks for the help guys, i am going to give that squared 5 software a shot.
it blows my mind that it can be complicated though, you know?
10 year old kids are posting crystal clear video on youtube without any problems...maybe i'm just getting old.
thanks again, gotta go shake my fist in the air at some kids listening to "that damn devil music."

Keith MacGowan February 10th, 2007 03:53 PM

I have to agree with the divx poster. Seems like I have gotten the best results using that. Shoot for that 100MB limit (to get the bestest quality) cause youtube recompresses it anyway.

Mike Wade February 11th, 2007 06:18 AM

Hi Dylan,
I was impressed by the quality of your wife's clip on youtube, and by the acting for that matter. Could you give us a little more info on the DviX settings you used ?

Art Willig February 16th, 2007 03:42 AM

yep...upload a 100mb divx
hope you have high speed or we'll see you next thursday

Bill Ravens February 16th, 2007 08:35 AM

I've had pretty good success with these recommended settings:
WMV
Audio 128kbps
Video 320x240, 1 mbps, best quality

Jeff Chandler February 16th, 2007 11:53 AM

Here's a free encoder that does a nice job of encoding from/to many different formats:

http://www.erightsoft.com/SUPER.html

Stu Holmes February 16th, 2007 01:36 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jason Leonard
i've scoured the youtube website and all that i can find is that they perfer the video to be under 10 minutes and 100 MB.

Umm well you can't have scoured that hard because its easy via 'Help' to find this page:
http://www.google.com/support/youtub...45&topic=10526
so it clearly says what you need to do for best quality.

And the The "prefer video to be under 10mins and 100Mb" is actually a "Must be under 10mins and 100Mb".

Paulo Teixeira February 16th, 2007 02:06 PM

You can always try using Google Video. I thought it was unlimited but they told me there is a cap of around 1.5 gigs. Still, 1.5 gigs to most people, is unlimited.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:16 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network