UV Filters at DVinfo.net

Stelios Christofides · March 5th, 2007, 04:49 AM

Hi guys

Do you guys use an UV filter on your camcorder all the time? Should I always keep it on my Sony HDR-FX7?

Stelios

Dan Keaton · March 5th, 2007, 05:50 AM

The lens on your camera is expensive and costly to replace or repair.

The front element of the lens is probably multi-coated. As such, it is moderately delicate and moderately difficult to clean.

While a lens can be cleaned, it is best to never get it dirty.

Also, depending on what you are shooting, some flying object may hit your lens.

Overall, it is best to keep a filter on your lens at all times. This way your lens is protected from objects, fingerprints, dust and dirt. You can clean your filter.

If the filter gets broken or too dirty to clean, you can replace it.

If the value of what you are recording far exceeds the value of your lens (and/or camera), and you want the absolute best image, then you can remove the filter for the shot and take your chances.

Mike Beckett · March 5th, 2007, 11:23 AM

I keep a UV filter on my VX2100 whenever possible, it does a great job. Only problem I have is that it can affect how lights appear in your shot - sometimes the nice 'starburst' effect is good, but sometimes it's not.

Also, when dealing with bright light, if I'm not careful I get a reflection of the lens in the filter at certain angles. I'm not sure if that's because it is a cheapo $15 filter or if that is something that will always happen no matter how good the filter is.

Hans Ledel · March 5th, 2007, 11:29 AM

You should never, never,never put a cheap filter on.

What is the point in buying a good cam if you put some crap in front of the lens.

Robert M Wright · March 5th, 2007, 11:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mike Beckett

Also, when dealing with bright light, if I'm not careful I get a reflection of the lens in the filter at certain angles. I'm not sure if that's because it is a cheapo $15 filter or if that is something that will always happen no matter how good the filter is.

You might try a Hoya Super Multi Coated UV filter. They're reasonably low in price and should cut down on the reflections considerably.

Mike Beckett · March 5th, 2007, 12:14 PM

Was £5.95 too cheap? Possibly. I had no idea what makes a good filter and what doesn't, I thought I'd give it a go. It's still kept a good few splashes off the lens.

Robert - the Hoya filters seem quite reasonably priced, around £13/$20, I'm not sure if this is still considered 'cheap'. One of my usual suppliers has a Tiffen UV filter for around $30, which is still reasonable.

Is the $20-$30 range still considered too cheap? I'm having difficulty finding anything more expensive at any of the UK online suppliers, without going into silly 'pro' prices.

Richard Alvarez · March 5th, 2007, 12:22 PM

I considered my 80 dollars well spent on the B&W filter in front of my 16x manual.

Mike Beckett · March 5th, 2007, 01:06 PM

Aha - I've found a UK supplier for B+W, Hoya and Canon filters.

Now to add to the confusion, I've found out that they have clear protective filters as well, and a search of the DVinfo forums reveals mixed opinions on which is better, whether to go for UV or clear, or whether we should use filters at all!

I think I'll try a B+W UV filter, and then maybe later have a go with a clear protective filter, as pocket money permits.

Mike Beckett · March 7th, 2007, 12:27 PM

OK, I took delivery of a Hoya Super HMC Pro 1 today priced approx $60. It's ultra thin and ultra good! I can still get the lens reflection effect, except it's very slight and I have to try very very hard to get it.

So top tip - thanks, guys!

Trond Saetre · March 7th, 2007, 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Robert M Wright

You might try a Hoya Super Multi Coated UV filter. They're reasonably low in price and should cut down on the reflections considerably.

I agree with Robert. I have the Hoya Super Multi Coated UV Haze filter, and I think it was a good investment. I always leave it on to protect the lense.

Michael Barrette · March 14th, 2007, 08:47 PM

My camera came with a tiffen UV filter. I leave it on pretty much all the time. Opinions on this filter brand?

Robert M Wright · March 14th, 2007, 09:41 PM

To the best of my knowledge, Tiffen doesn't make any premium UV filters.

Mark Holland · March 16th, 2007, 08:38 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Stelios Christofides

Hi guys

Do you guys use an UV filter on your camcorder all the time? Should I always keep it on my Sony HDR-FX7?

Stelios

Simple answers:

Yes, I do.

Yes, I would.

Yeo Wee Han · March 18th, 2007, 08:47 AM

I have not gotten my video eqpt yet but I have a B+W MRC filters on all my photographic lenses. They are superbly made and the glass is way tougher than that of the Hoya HMC Supers that I have used and thrown. Heliopan and Schneider are the other great ones. I leave them on most of the time other than when shooting against the sun where flare will be obvious and reducing any pieces of glass will always help.

Cheers

WeeHan

March 5th, 2007, 04:49 AM	#1
Stelios Christofides Trustee Join Date: Jul 2003 Location: Nicosia, CYPRUS Posts: 1,080	UV Filters Hi guys Do you guys use an UV filter on your camcorder all the time? Should I always keep it on my Sony HDR-FX7? Stelios __________________ My Blog: http://steliosc.blogspot.com "I hope for nothing, I fear nothing, I am free" Nikos Kazantzakis

March 5th, 2007, 05:50 AM	#2
Dan Keaton Inner Circle Join Date: Dec 2002 Location: Augusta Georgia Posts: 5,421	The lens on your camera is expensive and costly to replace or repair. The front element of the lens is probably multi-coated. As such, it is moderately delicate and moderately difficult to clean. While a lens can be cleaned, it is best to never get it dirty. Also, depending on what you are shooting, some flying object may hit your lens. Overall, it is best to keep a filter on your lens at all times. This way your lens is protected from objects, fingerprints, dust and dirt. You can clean your filter. If the filter gets broken or too dirty to clean, you can replace it. If the value of what you are recording far exceeds the value of your lens (and/or camera), and you want the absolute best image, then you can remove the filter for the shot and take your chances. __________________ Dan Keaton Augusta Georgia

March 5th, 2007, 11:29 AM	#4
Hans Ledel Regular Crew Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: Stockholm Sweden Posts: 184	You should never, never,never put a cheap filter on. What is the point in buying a good cam if you put some crap in front of the lens. __________________ Remember, that English is my second language.

Thread Tools	Search this Thread
Show Printable Version Email this Page	Search this Thread: Advanced Search

March 5th, 2007, 11:23 AM	#3
Mike Beckett Trustee Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland Posts: 1,569	I keep a UV filter on my VX2100 whenever possible, it does a great job. Only problem I have is that it can affect how lights appear in your shot - sometimes the nice 'starburst' effect is good, but sometimes it's not. Also, when dealing with bright light, if I'm not careful I get a reflection of the lens in the filter at certain angles. I'm not sure if that's because it is a cheapo $15 filter or if that is something that will always happen no matter how good the filter is.

March 5th, 2007, 12:14 PM	#6
Mike Beckett Trustee Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland Posts: 1,569	Was £5.95 too cheap? Possibly. I had no idea what makes a good filter and what doesn't, I thought I'd give it a go. It's still kept a good few splashes off the lens. Robert - the Hoya filters seem quite reasonably priced, around £13/$20, I'm not sure if this is still considered 'cheap'. One of my usual suppliers has a Tiffen UV filter for around $30, which is still reasonable. Is the $20-$30 range still considered too cheap? I'm having difficulty finding anything more expensive at any of the UK online suppliers, without going into silly 'pro' prices.

March 5th, 2007, 12:22 PM	#7
Richard Alvarez Inner Circle Join Date: Sep 2002 Location: San Mateo, CA Posts: 3,840	I considered my 80 dollars well spent on the B&W filter in front of my 16x manual.

March 5th, 2007, 01:06 PM	#8
Mike Beckett Trustee Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland Posts: 1,569	Aha - I've found a UK supplier for B+W, Hoya and Canon filters. Now to add to the confusion, I've found out that they have clear protective filters as well, and a search of the DVinfo forums reveals mixed opinions on which is better, whether to go for UV or clear, or whether we should use filters at all! I think I'll try a B+W UV filter, and then maybe later have a go with a clear protective filter, as pocket money permits.

March 7th, 2007, 12:27 PM	#9
Mike Beckett Trustee Join Date: Oct 2006 Location: Antrim, Northern Ireland Posts: 1,569	OK, I took delivery of a Hoya Super HMC Pro 1 today priced approx $60. It's ultra thin and ultra good! I can still get the lens reflection effect, except it's very slight and I have to try very very hard to get it. So top tip - thanks, guys!

March 14th, 2007, 08:47 PM	#11
Michael Barrette Regular Crew Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: calgary, Canada Posts: 48	My camera came with a tiffen UV filter. I leave it on pretty much all the time. Opinions on this filter brand?

March 14th, 2007, 09:41 PM	#12
Robert M Wright Inner Circle Join Date: Jan 2006 Location: Minnesota (USA) Posts: 2,171	To the best of my knowledge, Tiffen doesn't make any premium UV filters.

March 18th, 2007, 08:47 AM	#14
Yeo Wee Han Regular Crew Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: Singapore Posts: 155	I have not gotten my video eqpt yet but I have a B+W MRC filters on all my photographic lenses. They are superbly made and the glass is way tougher than that of the Hoya HMC Supers that I have used and thrown. Heliopan and Schneider are the other great ones. I leave them on most of the time other than when shooting against the sun where flare will be obvious and reducing any pieces of glass will always help. Cheers WeeHan