|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
February 9th, 2006, 08:55 AM
|
#1 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6
|
Does the lens make a difference.
For the time being I am probably going to just shoot in SD but I was curious if the HVX200 in SD actually produces better picture than the DVX100B. It is worth it to step up the to the HVX200.
Thanks for your time, Dave |
|
|
|
February 9th, 2006, 09:25 AM
|
#2 |
|
Go Go Godzilla
|
David,
Same reply as your previous post; use the search engine and look at discussions already started on this very topic.
__________________
Robert Lane Producer/Creator - Bike Pilots TV |
|
|
|
|
February 9th, 2006, 01:05 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Tourist
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1
|
Quote:
.......... |
|
|
|
|
|
February 9th, 2006, 01:37 PM
|
#4 |
|
New Boot
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 6
|
Alright, I have looked all over these forums and unless I'm not using the right keywords, I cannot seem to find anything comparing the quality of the lenses and determining whether or not the camera produces a better picture, even if it's just going to be used for SD.
Please inform, |
|
|
|
|
February 9th, 2006, 01:47 PM
|
#5 |
|
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 613
|
Yes, the HVX200 has a much sharper image in SD 16:9 anamorphic than the DVX100a. And regarding the the b rev on the DVX100, I don't think it did anything regarding it's res loss in anamorphic 16:9. So shooting SD on the HVX200 is similar to the high res of the Canon XL2, if not sharper.
__________________
www.holyzoo.com |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
