Current image quality of the Bravis 35mm
I was seduced by everything but i'm still unsure about its image sharpeness... To be honest i have seen footage from the M2 with better sharpness..
As i know Dennis is also working hard on the current bravis system day after day, i was wondering if there is a huge difference now in term of image sharpness? Could someone help me to make my choice...? PS: I have already seen the Phil Bloom comparaison article.. and it's clearly show that.. Many thanks vince* |
is this topic related to hvx somehow?
|
This should probably be moved to the Alternative Imaging forum.
|
Brevis and Redrock are used so often by HVX users that it should remain on this forum. Lots of threads at DVXUser 's HVX forums about this.
I have directly compared a Brevis w/CF 1 and CF3 diffusers and with CF1 it is definately sharper and much faster though also more depth of field and not quite as diffuse and pretty . The CF3 is comparable. Dennis' next adapter sounds like it may be sharper yet. |
Sorry I meant to say that I've compared the Brevis and the M2 and the CF1 is was somewhat sharper for me. Proper set-up is really important to making these comparison's though and the one thing I would say for sure is that the Brevis is certainly not softer.
Philip Bloom admitted his tests were hasty and he was not sure how good the set-ups were. I believe he is currently using a Brevis, but I'm not sure. They both look great. |
Sharper than this?
http://www.cinevate.com/images/brevisonice.mov |
|
All times are GMT -6. The time now is 02:49 PM. |
DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network