"Losing It" (a DVX-100A short) at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > And Now, For Something Completely Different... > Show Your Work

Show Your Work
Let's see what you're doing!

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old June 14th, 2004, 01:34 PM   #1
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Euless, Texas
Posts: 36
"Losing It" (a DVX-100A short)

I just completed a new piece for a short film contest. We had 8 days to complete the project. We were given the topic last week (which appears at the end of the film). I would love to hear your thoughts on the piece:


Settings: Standard F5, Shutter Speed 1/120, Edited in FCP (color corrected, diffused and levels adjusted).

Russell Pond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 14th, 2004, 03:01 PM   #2
Major Player
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 439
shelley long and tom cruise, right?

---(I know that was "losin it")
Josh Brusin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 14th, 2004, 06:50 PM   #3
Regular Crew
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Kansas City, Kansas, USA
Posts: 85
great job on the intro. Acting was sub par by some .. but they did their best. I guess im confused on what exactly the story was about. Kid stealing money from parents bank account? but not really?? just pretending to? Im not sure i understood it but overall i give it a B+ : ) the B+ is for Fortitude, good picture and cinematography, excellent intro.. just failing a little on bringing understanding of the situation to the person watching..
Scott Plowman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old June 14th, 2004, 11:13 PM   #4
Major Player
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 390
Nice. Great pacing and frenetic camerawork. I'm in the middle of watching the first season of 24 again and this definitely had the same tension and energy. I didn't completely get the story though. Also, more attention to lighting in the kitchen would have gone a long way, some colour correction as well. Overall, great job though!
Alex Taylor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 3rd, 2004, 07:22 PM   #5
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 4
too much handheld

I would suggest using a tripod. I think a lot of people out there get nauseaous (like myself) when it comes to too much hand held camera work. I like the existing light but I think just one light thrown on the subject would definitely help as well as a reflector - especially on the closeups. Acting is sub-standard. But I do see that the Panny is capable of producing nice images.
Val Rio is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2004, 12:15 AM   #6
Regular Crew
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: none
Posts: 35
more steady camera shots. Was the cine gamma used?

Good work though! Nobody is perfect, right? :)
Alex Melnikov is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2004, 01:20 AM   #7
Regular Crew
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 26
I actually liked the camera movement and thought that it captured the sense of urgency that you were probably going for. Tripods wouldn't have given your flick the same feel. As for the acting... not so good. I also agree with one of the comments about the story being a little difficult to understand.

Out of 5...

4 for editing
4 for camera work
3.5 for lighting
2.5 for acting
3.75 for direction
4 for intro

21.75/30 = .73%, which is slightly higher than a "C" I guess.

You got the editing and camera work down so keep 'em coming!

I'm REALLLY close to getting myself a DVX100A... how do you like yours?
David Chao is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 14th, 2004, 08:03 PM   #8
Regular Crew
Join Date: May 2004
Location: North Canton, Ohio
Posts: 109
I did get that sense of urgency, I think the camera work was extremely well done, maintaining balance and a frantic edge at the same time...that nauseus feeling...is the camera work effectively doing its job. I thought the acting was extremely well for the most part. The actress playing the mother seemed like the mother herself, the father seemed realistic as well, and the son seemed slightly like he was trying to be the frustrated son, rather than being the frustrated son. Im a complete amateur to movie making, but I figured I'd voice my opinion as well (y' know what they say about opinions, they're like...well, you know.) All in all, I felt the story and was sucked in by it. And the intro was very professional...I'm trying to figure out how to get that type on effect in Adobe AE 6.5 myself.
The only thing worse than quitting is being afraid to start. Get off your bum and go shoot something!
Christopher Reynolds is offline   Reply With Quote
Old August 21st, 2004, 08:12 AM   #9
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Hollywood, OHIO
Posts: 149
I liked the idea of the hand held, but it still neede to be slightly steadier. Great idea for a story, but as previously noted, the acting was sub-par (but good in some places).

Well edited, and the framing was great. Are you happy with the DVX100? Looks like it did some good for ya.
Peter John Ross is offline   Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

Omega Broadcast
(512) 251-7778
Austin, TX

(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

(800) 238-8480
Glendale, CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > And Now, For Something Completely Different... > Show Your Work

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search



All times are GMT -6. The time now is 09:19 PM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2015 The Digital Video Information Network