February 22nd, 2007, 07:57 AM
|
#31
|
|
Trustee
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 1,891
|
Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Steve Mullen
Any errors are mine as I tried to convert the info at the Silicon Optix promotion website to fit what was being talked about on an different thread here. Since the Silicon Optix posted your product review, obviously you know the topic very well. Equally obvious, my quick paraphrase has made no sense to some. So, if you care, can you jump in with your understanding of the role of a deinterlacer/scaler with PsF. I'm especially curious about PsF with a 2-3 cadence, but with no flags for the deinterlacer to sense.
Maybe as Bob claims -- no errors can be made. Or, if errors occur, they will cause no problems and will even be beneficial.
|
No no no...I meant my quip to be tongue in cheek...the Silicon Optix website described HQV deinterlacing exactly as you described it, per pixel, motion adaptive. I did not write the review...egg yolk running down my cheek.
|
|
|
