DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony HVR-Z1 / HDR-FX1 (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-hvr-z1-hdr-fx1/)
-   -   Sony HDR-FX1 Ginza Seminar Report (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-hvr-z1-hdr-fx1/32456-sony-hdr-fx1-ginza-seminar-report.html)

Chosei Funahara September 24th, 2004 08:29 AM

Sony HDR-FX1 Ginza Seminar Report
 
My colleague had participated in "Ginza seminar" of the HDV the other day.

Report from Japan:

The image that a large-scale plasma monitor for HD reproduced firmly conquered the weak point of MPEG2-TS by an image quality high as it was not possible to show with past DV, and was surprised at the image without failure at all for a moment also on the screen where a lot of movements existed to be finished.
I think that it turns in the one left as a record image.

However, it seems not to be suitable for a work that is too real, away from the reality.

Paul Henley September 24th, 2004 08:46 AM

Huh?

Chosei Funahara September 24th, 2004 08:51 AM

Sony HDR-FX1 Ginza Seminar Report
 
Sony had held HDR-FX1 seminar this week and this week end. Peaole were crazy about new Sony product; rushed to register, I send 3 colleagues to the seminar. I'm in US and working current DVX projects and couldn't attend it.

John Jay September 24th, 2004 09:10 AM

Hello Chosei

If I understand you correctly are you saying that -->

the pictures are good even when there is a lot of motion in the scene?

Chosei Funahara September 24th, 2004 09:25 AM

<<<-- Originally posted by John Jay : Hello Chosei

If I understand you correctly are you saying that -->

the pictures are good even when there is a lot of motion in the scene? -->>>
I got reports from my friend and he's saying that real fast camera move or shooting at real fast moving objects are clear enough to see without breaking up on MPEG-TS. The MPEG2 had weakness as you know.
I'll get more reports from my guys.

Heath McKnight September 24th, 2004 09:34 AM

I think he's saying that, like digital video (and the JVC HDV cameras), fast pans and movements may be a bad thing. But not quite as bad...

heath

Gary McClurg September 24th, 2004 10:54 AM

Makes me feel better that I wasn't the only one who was confused. So hopefully things are looking up with this camea.

Michael Struthers September 24th, 2004 11:19 AM

"may not be suitable for a work that is too real, away from the reality."

It looks like video and not film? I can accept that.

Chosei Funahara September 24th, 2004 11:36 AM

more report
 
Some people thought FX-1 is the best consumer camera at present. Test pictures are pretty decent but painful picture for example: Waterfall water drops, close up shots of waves of the ocean and general view of the ocean (wide and close up, both).
Allover MPEG picture that is tested and taken was beautiful.

Comparison: BS digital broadcasting in Japan is assumed to be 100%, FX1fs picture quality is about 80%.
However, the block noises are none at all.
Also s/n, gain up is very good, even 9db up, there is no noise.
Handling FX-1: itfs big and heavy, but if you use shoulder-pod, itfs will be easy and new 16:9 LCD monitor is very good and zoom in focus feature is very helpful. One negative feature is audio recoding level is very difficult control.

Anyway I got so much information, I canft translate everything, I think you guys better wait until real reporter will publish soon.
The responses are good, for the price, itfll be a winner.

Chosei Funahara September 24th, 2004 11:48 AM

comparison test bet. GY-DV300 and FX-1
 
one guy already posted:

http://www.geocities.jp/gyvsvx/HDRFX1.html

He did not have 1080i NLE, so you can't see real 1080i movement, but interesting.
If you are thinking buy new SD camera, you should buy FX-1. They say 24p (interlace) like feature on HD is good also.

Paul Henley September 24th, 2004 11:51 AM

Thanks Chosei,

Very encouraging report. It seems like this camera may very well raise the bar in prosumer video performance.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 11:42 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network