|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
April 12th, 2010, 11:50 PM
|
#1 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 176
|
AX2000 vs. HM400
http://www.fxsupport.de/test/ax2000_02.jpg
Above HM400, down AX2000 (1920x1080, FX Modus, F4.0, Gain -6dB, ND2) |
|
|
|
April 13th, 2010, 12:13 AM
|
#2 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New York, USA
Posts: 111
|
Hi Wolfgang
what are you comparing? The exposures are so different, with the bottom image being so much brighter, that it's hard for me to judge a real comparison. Adam |
|
|
|
|
April 13th, 2010, 12:16 AM
|
#3 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 176
|
Ax2000+HM400 in automatik modus:
http://www.fxsupport.de/test/ax2000_01.jpg above HM400, down AX2000 |
|
|
|
|
April 13th, 2010, 12:18 AM
|
#4 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Bremen, Germany
Posts: 176
|
is the AX2000 really FullHD?
|
|
|
|
|
April 13th, 2010, 07:54 AM
|
#5 |
|
Regular Crew
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Iasi, Romania
Posts: 121
|
I downloaded a test footage of JVC HM400, it has a nice quality, details, and vibrant colors. On my NX5 I didn't notice such a loss in details, maybe is something wrong with the settings on your AX2000.
|
|
|
|
|
April 13th, 2010, 01:15 PM
|
#6 |
|
Inner Circle
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 4,220
|
The automatic shots are not a fair comparison either. The HM400 is closer with a wide angle lens and the AX2000 is further away zoomed in to get close to the same image( note pots and size of bush on the left). This difference will affect the auto exposure and focusing depth of field.
Ron Evans |
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
||||||
|
|
