DV Info Net

DV Info Net (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/)
-   Sony NXCAM NEX-FS100 CineAlta (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-nxcam-nex-fs100-cinealta/)
-   -   Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac (https://www.dvinfo.net/forum/sony-nxcam-nex-fs100-cinealta/497381-content-management-utility-doesnt-work-mac.html)

Galen Rath June 19th, 2011 08:25 PM

Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
The included DVD with the Content Management Utility for AVCHD Camcorder is for Windows only. I guess I will eventually be able to answer my own question, but if anyone can clue me in quicker, what I am losing not being able to install this on my Mac? I wonder why Sony wouldn't include a Mac version.

Jon Braeley June 20th, 2011 05:30 AM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
What is your editing program on your Mac?

If you have FInal Cut then all you need is to use Log and Transfer.

I have no need for anything else with the FS-100.

Galen Rath June 20th, 2011 01:36 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Using Premiere Pro CS5 on the Mac.

Dave Morrison June 20th, 2011 02:10 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Braeley (Post 1659851)
What is your editing program on your Mac?

If you have FInal Cut then all you need is to use Log and Transfer.

I have no need for anything else with the FS-100.

Hey Jon,
Are you transcoding into ProRes during ingest? If so, how fast is it?

Jon Braeley June 20th, 2011 04:03 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Yes - I transfer into ProRes 422.

its very fast - processes in real time. No problems with the workflow at all - on a new Macbook pro with a G-drive.

Kenneth Sorento June 30th, 2011 03:11 AM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Does anyone know how to transfer 50p 1080 footage from the Sony FS100 to Final Cut Pro 7? Using Log and Transfer does not work. The software is able to see 25P and so on, but not 50P. I've been told that I need an updated Sony driver, but I can't find it on the net and it's not supplied with the camcorder.

I've contacted Peter Sykes from Sony UK, and he will put me in contact with a Japanese engineer tomorrow, but if anyone has an answer today, it would be just great.

Matt Davis June 30th, 2011 07:27 AM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
I'm using Episode Pro to convert the .MTS files to ProRes. You need to set the 'Field Order' section to 'Source is Progressive' in order for it to work.

Whilst sound is recorded in the 1080p50 video, Episode does NOT extract it, so for this temporary solution, shoot with dual sound and ensure you slate your shots both visually and audibly of course.

Galen Rath July 9th, 2011 09:22 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Getting back to importing files to a MAC (I'm using PP CS5)--p. 102 of the FS100 manual says not to try and open and access files in the PRIVATE folder on the FS100 from a computer or else they could be damaged. That is interesting, hope that doesn't happen to anyone. That seems like something everyone get around to doing sometime.

Also the manual says not to copy files on the recording media from a computer. Operation is not guaranteed. Right now that is how I am getting files into CS5--I am copying the PRIVATE folder and pasting it to the MAC, and then importing the clips into CS5 using ADOBE Bridge. Is there a better way to import the files directly from the camera onto a MAC/CS5?

Derran Rootring July 10th, 2011 03:27 AM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Thanks for the heads up about not opening files directly from the private folder!

You're talking about "not to copy files on the recording media from a computer". Did you mean TO a computer? Otherwise I don't think you are doing anything wrong. As long as you don't copy files from your computer to the SD card, it should work fine the way you described.

I always use log and transfer directly from the card.

Doug Jensen July 10th, 2011 12:29 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Jon Braeley (Post 1660016)
Yes - I transfer into ProRes 422.

its very fast - processes in real time. No problems with the workflow at all - on a new Macbook pro with a G-drive.

Since when is "real time" considered very fast? Transcoding to ProRes is about 6x slower than doing a straight file transfer or ingesting comparable XDCAM footage. That does not fit my definition of real fast.
The workflow for FCP and AVCHD stinks.

Galen Rath July 10th, 2011 01:29 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
After I copy the private folder to the Mac, I drag the private folder to a bin inside of CS5, and the clips are there. I just end up with a PRIVATE folder inside of the Bin, and then have to open that to view the clips. Also get an error message when dragging the PRIVATE folder into CS5 because some of the files in it are not the right type to transfer, I just ignore that message. I just don't think this way is what is intended.

Matt Davis July 11th, 2011 03:34 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
In Premiere Pro CS5.5, are you getting any of the metadata from FS100 shots? User Bits? Exposure info? GPS info?

Galen Rath July 11th, 2011 05:06 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
I'm new to CS5, but clicking around the METADATA tab, I'm not seeing any special stats from the camera like exposure settings, GPS, I see just what I consider standard information.

Jon Braeley July 12th, 2011 06:26 AM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Doug realize I am also encoding to Prores 422 whereas you are talking about straight file transfer.

Doug Jensen July 12th, 2011 03:58 PM

Re: Content Management Utility doesn't work on Mac
 
Jon, I understand exactly what you were saying. My point is that transcoding slows the ingest down by at least 84% -- even slower than real time. That does not fit my definition of being fast. My comparison to a straight file transfer was just to establish a baseline so we can tell exactly how much transcoding is slowing down the ingest. It is easy to see that transcoding takes 6-7 times longer than a straight transfer.

I guess I'm spoiled by XDCAM where ingest is 7x faster than NXCAM and you don't have to transcode to ProRes and have the joy of file sizes that are suddenly 6 times bigger -- with absolutely no benefit.


All times are GMT -6. The time now is 06:28 AM.

DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2024 The Digital Video Information Network