What do u think on theses two lenses? at DVinfo.net

Go Back   DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony Digital Cinema Camera Systems > Sony NXCAM NEX-FS100 CineAlta

Sony NXCAM NEX-FS100 CineAlta
An interchangeable lens AVCHD camcorder using E-Mount lenses.


Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread
Old May 3rd, 2012, 11:30 AM   #1
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
What do u think on theses two lenses?

I am thinking to choose between these two lense
Please leave your comments

1, Nikon 17-55mm f2.8

2, Sony e-mount Zeiss 24mm f1.8
Thomas Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 3rd, 2012, 03:54 PM   #2
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Port Orange Fl
Posts: 317
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

Thomas,

I did a wedding where the photographer had it on his still camera, so i used my noflex adapter and fell in love.
I have a nikon still camera so i would get double duty. I don't know about the 24 e mount. If I had the money i would definitely get it.

Dan
Dan Asseff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 04:39 AM   #3
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

will i need lens support for 17-55mm nikon?
people said it's heavy, need to use the lens with a rig? i worry the lens is heavy than the fs100 body
Thomas Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 07:45 AM   #4
Major Player
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Port Orange Fl
Posts: 317
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

I think you will. It is very heavy. The image is beautiful though.

Dan
Dan Asseff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 02:07 PM   #5
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nieuw-Vossemeer, The Netherlands
Posts: 451
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

I do not give any warranty, but I use the FS100 with a NEX/NIK adapter and the Nikkor 17-55 without any support. I even use the 80-200/2.8 now and then without support, just because I change lenses a lot and don not always take the time to adjust the support rail everytime. I feel completely comfortable with it but can of cause only take responsibilty for my own actions.
Cees van Kempen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 02:24 PM   #6
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

Thx cees

And how do you like the 17-55mm on fs100?

I am also looking at the sigma 18-50 for 1/3 the price.
People said the quality is very close to Nikon, and it's lighter too
But I think Nikon has a better name when you resell the lens.
Thomas Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 4th, 2012, 02:26 PM   #7
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

I only have adapter with no aperture control. Do u think it's ok to keep it at wide open all the time?
Cos I have a 35mm 2.8, I most of the time leave it at 2.8

For 17-55, is it sharp at 17&55 at f2.8?
Thomas Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 5th, 2012, 06:22 AM   #8
Major Player
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Nieuw-Vossemeer, The Netherlands
Posts: 451
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

I cannot judge the Sigma, since I never used it. But i am very happy with the Nikkor, it's build like a tank and quality is very good, also wide open. I think however it is difficult to use it without an aparture ring. Not only for controlling light, but also for depth of field. i am very happy with the Novoflex NEX/NIk adapter.
Cees van Kempen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 5th, 2012, 06:37 AM   #9
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Germany
Posts: 23
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

Hi Thomas,

I just got my Novoflex-adapter and it seems really solid and reliable. I tried it with my Sigma 10-20 and Sigma 50mm 1.4 and liked the focus ring with true stops very much. After I get my NEX5 with the 18-55 kit lens I don't think I would want or need need anymore e-mount lenses.

Anyone in Europe who knows how long it takes for Sony UK to do the delivery of the NEX5 and kit-lens bundled with the FS100 those days? I send my application off a week ago.
Stephan Hubenthal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2012, 05:47 PM   #10
Trustee
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

I have the Nikkor 17-55 2.8 via the MTF adaptor, and it's my Primary Go-To Lens (closely followed by the Tokina).

It works well wide open, covers most of the S35 interview focal lengths, it's wickedly sharp when stopped down a smidgen, has a lovely look and lovely bokeh. I repeat - this is my most used lens.

Well, it is until now, and with the Metabones adaptor I'm moving over to the Canon 17-55 2.8 with IS.

But both are used WITHOUT support. Had no problems or issues with it - the MTF adaptor has been superb in that respect.

Longer lenses? Yes, probably. My Tokina 80-200 2.8 visibly *bends* on its cheap Canon dumb adaptor (actually it's in my imagination - but I can hear the camera cry out in pain).

A colleage has done something a bit like me - got a bunch of 'classic FD' lenses but has since been given a weekend with some manual Nikkor primes and now wants to junk everything and go Nikkor.

I'm not so sure it's that cut and dried. I love my Nikkor 17-55 2.8, it's just so GOOD.

But it is big, heavy, focuses the wrong way (infuriating) and the MTF adaptor operates the iris in a 30 degree arc from open to closed. That can take some getting used to.
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro
EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6
Matt Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2012, 05:55 PM   #11
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

Thank for the comments. I wouldn't think the Zeiss 24mm f1.8 now
The main reason is... It an e-mount, I can't use it anywhere other than nex camera

I am also looking at Sony 16-50mm f2.8with laea2 adapter. It will give autofocus and iris control to the lens
The lens seems sharp and have parfocus.
Thomas Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2012, 05:56 PM   #12
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

And Matt
One more thing, do u keep the 17-55 always on the fs100?
Thomas Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2012, 06:13 PM   #13
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

Is Nikon 17-55mm a parfocus lens?
Thomas Wong is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2012, 06:14 PM   #14
Trustee
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Berkshire, UK
Posts: 1,562
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

LOL - no, the way my kitbag is packed, I use the kit lens as a 'lens cap' but with a charged battery and an empty card in the camera so I can pull it out and shoot anything within seconds. But on 99.97% of jobs, I pull the camera out, put the 17-55 Nikkor on, keep the Tokina (with its dumb mount, maybe now the Metabones) in my pocket (Scott-e-vest rocks for this) and keep a weather eye open on my Nikkor fit Samyang and FD fit Canon 35-105 f3.5.

But like I said, I don't know just how much that Metabones adaptor is going to change things. I do love the Nikkor, but I may fall in love with the Canon all over again, which has been the staple for my stills.

Edit - is the 17-55 parfocal? Maybe.

Look, this may not be of any real use to anyone but I throw it up to y'all as a simple test that seems pertinent to the way this thread is going.


This was shared amongst my videographer friends and we've all had a good bitch about using lenses at their widest aperture, and how you might buy a 1.2 lens to use at f2, and therefore we have to buy a Noktor f0.95 lens to use at f1.4 simply to get nice contrasty images at a 'wide open' style aperture, and that even f2.8 is bottling it a bit and here's me with the hots for the 24-105 f4 which has IS. But I digress.

I thought my eBay special 35-104 was parfocal but it's not. The Nikkor is darn close and at f4, I think it is. Deffo can pull in a bit with a little twist of the zoom when interviews begin to drift into the 'OMG' territory. That's better done on a dolly, but I've never had an OMFG moment in an interview when my camera's on a slider on a tripod or couple of lighting stands. Subject's too 'respectful' to drop clangers with so much kit around, so thanks Nikkor for a smooth rotating ring zoom so we can signal stuff to our viewers.
__________________
Director/Editor - MDMA Ltd: Write, Shoot, Edit, Publish - mattdavis.pro
EX1 x2, C100 --> FCPX & PPro6
Matt Davis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old May 10th, 2012, 06:19 PM   #15
Regular Crew
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 144
Re: What do u think on theses two lenses?

Lol, I use the 16mm pancake as body cap...
Cos I still couldn't make up my mind to buy Nikon or Sony
Thomas Wong is offline   Reply
Reply

DV Info Net refers all where-to-buy and where-to-rent questions exclusively to these trusted full line dealers and rental houses...

Professional Video
(800) 833-4801
Portland, OR

B&H Photo Video
(866) 521-7381
New York, NY

Z.G.C.
(973) 335-4460
Mountain Lakes, NJ

Abel Cine Tech
(888) 700-4416
N.Y. NY & L.A. CA

Precision Camera
(800) 677-1023
Austin, TX

DV Info Net also encourages you to support local businesses and buy from an authorized dealer in your neighborhood.
  You are here: DV Info Net > Sony XAVC / XDCAM / NXCAM / AVCHD / HDV / DV Camera Systems > Sony Digital Cinema Camera Systems > Sony NXCAM NEX-FS100 CineAlta

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search

 



Google
 

All times are GMT -6. The time now is 03:44 PM.


DV Info Net -- Real Names, Real People, Real Info!
1998-2017 The Digital Video Information Network